Athlon 64 3400+ vs Turion 64 MT-37

Athlon 64 3400+ vs Turion 64 MT-37 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 3400+

1 / 1

545

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Turion 64 MT-37

1 / 1

555

+1.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 3400+ vs Turion 64 MT-37 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 3400+ vs Turion 64 MT-37: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 3400+

2001

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (545 vs 555).
❌Launch MSRP is still $440 MSRP, while Turion 64 MT-37 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌8800% higher power demand at 89W vs 1W.

Turion 64 MT-37

2005

Why buy it

✅+1.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 89W, a 88W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion 64 MT-37 better than Athlon 64 3400+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon 64 3400+ is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 MT-37 pulls ahead with 1.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 MT-37 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion 64 MT-37 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Turion 64 MT-37 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $440 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.8% better PassMark. Athlon 64 3400+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2001 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (1.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on 754.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Turion 64 MT-37 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2005 vs 2001) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 64 3400+ vs Turion 64 MT-37 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 3400+

The Athlon 64 3400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $149.

Turion 64 MT-37

The Turion 64 MT-37 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 555 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 3400+ and Turion 64 MT-37 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Athlon 64 3400+ versus 2 GHz on the Turion 64 MT-37 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3400+. The Athlon 64 3400+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Turion 64 MT-37 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3400+ scores 545 against the Turion 64 MT-37's 555 — a 1.8% lead for the Turion 64 MT-37. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon 64 3400+	Turion 64 MT-37
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+20%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K+51100%	1 MB
Process	130 nm	90 nm-31%
Architecture	Clawhammer (2001−2005)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	545	555+2%