Athlon 64 3500+
Athlon II Neo K145
Athlon 64 3500+ vs Athlon II Neo K145 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 64 3500+ vs Athlon II Neo K145 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon 64 3500+ vs Athlon II Neo K145: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 64 3500+
2001Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 11.3 PassMark/$ ($272 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌8800% higher power demand at 89W vs 1W.
Athlon II Neo K145
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $222 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $272 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 439.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.3 vs 2.1 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $272 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 89W, a 88W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (565 vs 570).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon 64 3500+ better than Athlon II Neo K145?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 64 3500+ vs Athlon II Neo K145 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon 64 3500+
The Athlon 64 3500+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 570 points. Launch price was $59.
Athlon II Neo K145
The Athlon II Neo K145 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Nile (2010) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 565 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 64 3500+ and Athlon II Neo K145 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3500+ versus 1.8 GHz on the Athlon II Neo K145 — a 20% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3500+. The Athlon 64 3500+ uses the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Athlon II Neo K145 uses Nile (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3500+ scores 570 against the Athlon II Neo K145's 565 — a 0.9% lead for the Athlon 64 3500+.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3500+ | Athlon II Neo K145 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz+22% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 1 MB+100% |
| Process | 130 nm | 45 nm-65% |
| Architecture | San Diego (2001−2005) | Nile (2010) |
| PassMark | 570 | 565 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 3500+ uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon II Neo K145 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-400 on the Athlon 64 3500+ versus DDR3-1066 on the Athlon II Neo K145 — the Athlon II Neo K145 supports -366.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD 939 (Athlon 64 3500+) and AMD ASB2 (Athlon II Neo K145).
| Feature | Athlon 64 3500+ | Athlon II Neo K145 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 939 | S1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-400 | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon 64 3500+ was priced at $272, while the Athlon II Neo K145 came in at $50. On launch pricing ($272 vs $50), Athlon II Neo K145 was $222 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 3500+ delivers 2.1 pts/$ vs 11.3 pts/$ for the Athlon II Neo K145 — making the Athlon II Neo K145 the 137.4% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3500+ | Athlon II Neo K145 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $272 | $50-82% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.1 | 11.3+438% |
| Release Date | 2001 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 3500+ and Athlon II Neo K145
