Athlon 64 3500+
Opteron 148
Athlon 64 3500+ vs Opteron 148 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 64 3500+ vs Opteron 148 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon 64 3500+ vs Opteron 148: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 64 3500+
2001Why buy it
- ✅+4% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $272 MSRP, while Opteron 148 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Opteron 148
2005Why buy it
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 89W, a 4W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (548 vs 570).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon 64 3500+ better than Opteron 148?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 64 3500+ vs Opteron 148 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon 64 3500+
The Athlon 64 3500+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 570 points. Launch price was $59.
Opteron 148
The Opteron 148 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 548 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 64 3500+ and Opteron 148 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3500+ versus 2.2 GHz on the Opteron 148 — identical boost frequencies. The Athlon 64 3500+ uses the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Opteron 148 uses SledgeHammer (2003−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3500+ scores 570 against the Opteron 148's 548 — a 3.9% lead for the Athlon 64 3500+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3500+ | Opteron 148 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 1 MB+100% |
| Process | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Architecture | San Diego (2001−2005) | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) |
| PassMark | 570+4% | 548 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the 939 socket with PCIe 1.1.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3500+ | Opteron 148 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 939 | 939 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 3500+ and Opteron 148
