Athlon 64 FX-51
VS
Opteron 150

Athlon 64 FX-51 vs Opteron 150

AMD

Athlon 64 FX-51

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2003
VS
AMD

Opteron 150

1 Cores1 Thrd85 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 FX-51 is positioned at rank 1133 and the Opteron 150 is on rank 726, so the Opteron 150 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 FX-51

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
371089%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
350643%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
254595%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
76699%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
60754%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
53148%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
30440%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
30043%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
27355%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
27352%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
27046%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
26317%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
25949%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
25844%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
25610%
#1133
Athlon 64 FX-51
MSRP: $733|Avg: $733
100%
#1134
Athlon 64 FX-55
MSRP: $827|Avg: $50
99%
#1135
Athlon 64 FX-53
MSRP: $799|Avg: $15
96%
#1136
Athlon XP 2000+
MSRP: $339|Avg: $40
88%
#1137
Athlon 64 FX-57
MSRP: $1031|Avg: $200
83%
#1138
Athlon XP 3000+
MSRP: $588|Avg: $20
82%
#1139
Athlon XP 2100+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $30
75%
#1140
Pentium III 1266S
MSRP: $369|Avg: $20
68%
#1141
Pentium 4 1.80
MSRP: $562|Avg: $40
48%
#1142
Pentium III 1133
MSRP: $990|Avg: $30
21%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 150

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
14205%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2682%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2383%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1841%
#423
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
MSRP: $6499|Avg: $3444
100%
#424
Xeon W-2155
MSRP: $1440|Avg: $150
99%
#425
Xeon Gold 6348
MSRP: $3583|Avg: $2097
99%
#425
Xeon 6740E
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $3949
99%
#427
EPYC 7702P
MSRP: $4425|Avg: N/A
98%
#428
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9879.97
98%
#726
Opteron 150
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#727
Xeon E5-2609 v3
MSRP: $306|Avg: $306
100%
#729
Xeon Bronze 3106
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
100%
#734
Xeon L5609
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
98%
#737
Xeon E3-1245 v3
MSRP: $490|Avg: $490
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Opteron 150 leads in gaming performance. However, the Athlon 64 FX-51 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAthlon 64 FX-51Opteron 150
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($733)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (SledgeHammer (2003−2005) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Venus (2004−2005) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAthlon 64 FX-51Opteron 150
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($733)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 FX-51 and Opteron 150

AMD

Athlon 64 FX-51

The Athlon 64 FX-51 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 615 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Opteron 150

The Opteron 150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Venus (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 585 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 FX-51 and Opteron 150 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-51 versus 2.4 GHz on the Opteron 150 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Opteron 150. The Athlon 64 FX-51 uses the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Opteron 150 uses Venus (2004−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-51 scores 615 against the Opteron 150's 585 — a 5% lead for the Athlon 64 FX-51. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon 64 FX-51Opteron 150
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
2.4 GHz+9%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
Process
130 nm
130 nm
Architecture
SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
Venus (2004−2005)
PassMark
615+5%
585
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 FX-51 uses the 940 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Opteron 150 uses 939 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon 64 FX-51Opteron 150
Socket
940
939
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR-400
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0