Athlon 64 3000+
CPU·Budget

Athlon 64 3000+

AMD

PassMark

450

MSRP

$149

AVG Price

$10

Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago)
89 Watt
Clawhammer (2001−2005)

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Overview

The Athlon 64 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 450 points. Launch price was $65.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Athlon 64 3000+ is positioned at rank #1095 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3000+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
103217%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
97530%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
70815%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
21333%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
16898%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
14783%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
8467%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
8356%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
7609%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
7608%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
7523%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
7320%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
7218%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
7188%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
7123%
#1095
Athlon 64 3000+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
100%
#1096
Athlon XP 3100+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
94%
#1097
Athlon 64 3300+
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
86%
#1098
Athlon 64 2800+
MSRP: $178|Avg: $15
78%
#1099
Athlon 64 3700+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $20
76%
#1100
Athlon 64 FX-72
MSRP: $799|Avg: $40
75%
#1101
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
MSRP: $581|Avg: $110
72%
#1102
Athlon 64 3500+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $10
70%
#1103
Pentium D 830
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
65%
#1104
Pentium D 960
MSRP: $523|Avg: $15
64%
#1105
Athlon XP 2500+
MSRP: $172|Avg: $15
62%
#1106
Athlon 64 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $10
61%
#1107
Pentium 4 2.53
MSRP: $193|Avg: $13
59%
#1108
Pentium 4 2.40
MSRP: $193|Avg: $193
56%
#1109
Athlon XP 2400+
MSRP: $193|Avg: $10
52%
#1110
Pentium D 950
MSRP: $637|Avg: $10
49%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Technical Analysis

Detailed breakdown of Athlon 64 3000+ specifications and capabilities.

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 3000+ is a 1-core / 1-thread processor based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture, manufactured on a 130 nm process node. It reaches a maximum boost clock of 2 GHz— higher boost clocks directly translate to better single-threaded performance and responsiveness in gaming. It carries 0 kB of L3 cache, plus 512K of L2 cache and 128 kB of L1 cache per core. In the PassMark benchmark (a comprehensive multi-threaded test), it scores 450, placing it in the Entry Level performance tier as a Legacy generation product.

SpecificationAthlon 64 3000+
Cores / ThreadsPhysical/logical processing units1C / 1T
Max Boost ClockPeak single-core speed under boost2 GHz
ArchitectureCPU microarchitecture designClawhammer (2001−2005)
Process NodeFabrication technology — smaller = more efficient130 nm
L3 CacheShared cache — reduces memory latency for all cores0 kB
L2 CachePer-core fast cache for frequently accessed data512K
L1 CacheUltra-fast per-core cache128 kB
Die SizePhysical silicon area of the processor193 mm2
Transistor CountMore transistors = more capabilities154 million
64-bit SupportYes
Windows 11 CompatibleNo
PassMark ScoreOverall multi-threaded benchmark score450
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 3000+ fits into the 754 socket and supports PCIe 1.1 with 0 total PCIe lanes for expansion cards and storage.

SpecificationAthlon 64 3000+
TypeDesktop or Laptop processordesktop
SocketMotherboard socket required754
PCIe GenerationPeripheral interconnect speed — affects GPU and SSD bandwidthPCIe 1.1
PCIe LanesTotal available lanes for GPUs, NVMe drives, and expansion0
Max RAM SpeedMaximum officially supported memory frequencyDDR-400
Max RAM CapacityMaximum installable memory4 GB
RAM ChannelsDual-channel doubles bandwidth vs single-channel2
ECC SupportError-Correcting Code memory — prevents data corruptionNo
Integrated GPUBuilt-in graphics processorNo
Compatible ChipsetsMotherboard chipsets that support this CPUAMD 939
Max CPUs in ConfigMulti-socket support for servers1
🌡️

Power & Cooling

The Athlon 64 3000+ has a rated TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 89 Watt — this indicates the amount of heat generated under sustained load and determines what cooling solution is needed.

SpecificationAthlon 64 3000+
TDPThermal Design Power — heat output under sustained workload89 Watt
💰

Value Analysis

At an average price of $10 (MSRP: $149), the Athlon 64 3000+ delivers 45 PassMark points per dollar. It currently holds Rank #1095 in the overall cost-benefit ranking — this ranking factors in performance-per-dollar relative to all available processors. Performance ranking position: #3491 out of all indexed processors.

SpecificationAthlon 64 3000+
MSRPManufacturer's Suggested Retail Price$149
Avg Price (30d)Average market price over the last 30 days$10
Launch PriceOriginal retail price at launch$65
Cost-Benefit RankPosition in overall value ranking#1095
Performance RankPosition in overall performance ranking#3491
Release DateLaunch dateJaneiro 2001 (24 years ago)
Release Year2001
DesignerArchitecture designer (e.g. Intel, AMD)AMD

Our Recommendation for Athlon 64 3000+

Suggested pairings based on performance balance

Compare Athlon 64 3000+

See how this CPU stacks up against similar alternatives

Compare with other CPUs