Athlon 64 3000+ vs Pentium M 745

Athlon 64 3000+ vs Pentium M 745 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 3000+

1 / 1

450

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium M 745

1 / 1

465

+3.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 3000+ vs Pentium M 745 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 3000+ vs Pentium M 745: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 3000+

2001

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium M 745 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (450 vs 465).
❌Launch MSRP is still $149 MSRP, while Pentium M 745 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌323.8% higher power demand at 89W vs 21W.

Pentium M 745

2004

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 21W instead of 89W, a 68W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 745 better than Athlon 64 3000+?

Yes. Pentium M 745 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.7% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium M 745 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.7% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 745 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 745 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium M 745 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.7% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon 64 3000+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2001 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (3.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on 754.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium M 745 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2004 vs 2001) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 64 3000+ vs Pentium M 745 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 3000+

The Athlon 64 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 450 points. Launch price was $65.

Pentium M 745

The Pentium M 745 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 465 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 3000+ and Pentium M 745 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3000+ versus 1.8 GHz on the Pentium M 745 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3000+. The Athlon 64 3000+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Pentium M 745 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3000+ scores 450 against the Pentium M 745's 465 — a 3.3% lead for the Pentium M 745. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon 64 3000+	Pentium M 745
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2 GHz+11%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K+25500%	2 MB
Process	130 nm	90 nm-31%
Architecture	Clawhammer (2001−2005)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	450	465+3%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	100
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	100

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 3000+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium M 745 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-400 on the Athlon 64 3000+ versus DDR2 on the Pentium M 745 — the Pentium M 745 supports -100.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 3000+ supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon 64 3000+) vs 1 (Pentium M 745). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD 939 (Athlon 64 3000+) and Intel 855GME,Intel 855PM (Pentium M 745).