Athlon 64 3000+
Turion 64 ML-30
Athlon 64 3000+ vs Turion 64 ML-30 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 64 3000+ vs Turion 64 ML-30 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon 64 3000+ vs Turion 64 ML-30: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 64 3000+
2001Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Turion 64 ML-30 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (450 vs 475).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $149 MSRP, while Turion 64 ML-30 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌8800% higher power demand at 89W vs 1W.
Turion 64 ML-30
2005Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 89W, a 88W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Turion 64 ML-30 better than Athlon 64 3000+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 64 3000+ vs Turion 64 ML-30 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon 64 3000+
The Athlon 64 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 450 points. Launch price was $65.
Turion 64 ML-30
The Turion 64 ML-30 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 64 3000+ and Turion 64 ML-30 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3000+ versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-30 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3000+. The Athlon 64 3000+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Turion 64 ML-30 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3000+ scores 450 against the Turion 64 ML-30's 475 — a 5.4% lead for the Turion 64 ML-30. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3000+ | Turion 64 ML-30 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz+25% | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K+51100% | 1 MB |
| Process | 130 nm | 90 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Clawhammer (2001−2005) | Lancaster (2005−2006) |
| PassMark | 450 | 475+6% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the 754 socket with PCIe 1.1.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3000+ | Turion 64 ML-30 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | 754 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 3000+ and Turion 64 ML-30
