Athlon 64 3000+
Mobile Sempron M100
Athlon 64 3000+ vs Mobile Sempron M100 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 64 3000+ vs Mobile Sempron M100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Call of Duty: Warzone
Civilization VI
Cyberpunk 2077
Deadlock
Athlon 64 3000+ vs Mobile Sempron M100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 64 3000+
2001Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 89W instead of 512W, a 423W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $149 MSRP, while Mobile Sempron M100 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Mobile Sempron M100
2009Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (448 vs 450).
- ❌475.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 89W.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon 64 3000+ better than Mobile Sempron M100?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 64 3000+ vs Mobile Sempron M100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon 64 3000+
The Athlon 64 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 450 points. Launch price was $65.
Mobile Sempron M100
The Mobile Sempron M100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: S. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 448 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 64 3000+ and Mobile Sempron M100 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3000+ versus 2 GHz on the Mobile Sempron M100 — identical boost frequencies. The Athlon 64 3000+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Mobile Sempron M100 uses Caspian (2009) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3000+ scores 450 against the Mobile Sempron M100's 448 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon 64 3000+.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3000+ | Mobile Sempron M100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 512K | 512 kB |
| Process | 130 nm | 40 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Clawhammer (2001−2005) | Caspian (2009) |
| PassMark | 450 | 448 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 3000+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Mobile Sempron M100 uses S (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3000+ | Mobile Sempron M100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | S |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 3000+ and Mobile Sempron M100
