Athlon 64 3000+ vs Pentium M 1.70

AMD

Athlon 64 3000+

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2 GHz2001
VS
Intel

Pentium M 1.70

1 Cores1 Thrd24 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2003

Athlon 64 3000+ vs Pentium M 1.70 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 3000+ vs Pentium M 1.70 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 3000+ vs Pentium M 1.70: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 3000+

2001

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Launch MSRP is still $149 MSRP, while Pentium M 1.70 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
    • ❌270.8% higher power demand at 89W vs 24W.

    Pentium M 1.70

    2003

    Why buy it

    • βœ…Draws 24W instead of 89W, a 65W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark (435 vs 450).

    Quick Answers

    So, is Athlon 64 3000+ better than Pentium M 1.70?
    Yes. Athlon 64 3000+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 3.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 3000+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 3000+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Athlon 64 3000+ is the better buy right now. Athlon 64 3000+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at $149 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (3.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Pentium M 1.70 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2003 vs 2001). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Athlon 64 3000+ vs Pentium M 1.70 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon 64 3000+

    The Athlon 64 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001βˆ’2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 450 points. Launch price was $65.

    Intel

    Pentium M 1.70

    The Pentium M 1.70 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Banias (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 24 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 435 points. Launch price was $69.

    ⚑

    Processing Power

    Both the Athlon 64 3000+ and Pentium M 1.70 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3000+ versus 1.7 GHz on the Pentium M 1.70 β€” a 16.2% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3000+. The Athlon 64 3000+ uses the Clawhammer (2001βˆ’2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Pentium M 1.70 uses Banias (2003) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3000+ scores 450 against the Pentium M 1.70's 435 β€” a 3.4% lead for the Athlon 64 3000+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureAthlon 64 3000+Pentium M 1.70
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    2 GHz+18%
    1.7 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    512K+51100%
    1 MB
    Process
    130 nm
    130 nm
    Architecture
    Clawhammer (2001βˆ’2005)
    Banias (2003)
    PassMark
    450+3%
    435
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Athlon 64 3000+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium M 1.70 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureAthlon 64 3000+Pentium M 1.70
    Socket
    754
    PGA478
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 1.1
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR-400
    β€”
    Max RAM Capacity
    4 GB
    β€”
    RAM Channels
    2
    β€”
    ECC Support
    No
    β€”
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    β€”