Athlon 64 3000+ vs Sempron LE-1300

AMD

Athlon 64 3000+

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2 GHz2001
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Sempron LE-1300

1 Cores1 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2007
Similar parts
·······

Athlon 64 3000+ vs Sempron LE-1300 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 3000+ vs Sempron LE-1300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 3000+ vs Sempron LE-1300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 3000+

2001

Why buy it

  • +2.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $149 MSRP, while Sempron LE-1300 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 97.8% higher power demand at 89W vs 45W.

Sempron LE-1300

2007

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 89W, a 44W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (438 vs 450).

Quick Answers

So, is Sempron LE-1300 better than Athlon 64 3000+?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Sempron LE-1300 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 3000+ pulls ahead with 2.7% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 3000+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Sempron LE-1300 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Sempron LE-1300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon 64 3000+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2001 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (3.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on 754.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Sempron LE-1300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2007 vs 2001). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 3000+ vs Sempron LE-1300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon 64 3000+

The Athlon 64 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 450 points. Launch price was $65.

AMD

Sempron LE-1300

The Sempron LE-1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Sparta (2007) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 438 points. Launch price was $12.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 3000+ and Sempron LE-1300 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3000+ versus 2.3 GHz on the Sempron LE-1300 — a 14% clock advantage for the Sempron LE-1300. The Athlon 64 3000+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Sempron LE-1300 uses Sparta (2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3000+ scores 450 against the Sempron LE-1300's 438 — a 2.7% lead for the Athlon 64 3000+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon 64 3000+Sempron LE-1300
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.3 GHz+15%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K
512 kB
Process
130 nm
65 nm-50%
Architecture
Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Sparta (2007)
PassMark
450+3%
438
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 3000+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron LE-1300 uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon 64 3000+Sempron LE-1300
Socket
754
AM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR-400
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
0