Athlon 64 3000+ vs Core i5-13400F

CPU

GPU

Athlon 64 3000+

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2 GHz2001

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Athlon 64 3000+ vs Core i5-13400F Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 3000+

1 / 1

450

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-13400F

10 / 16

25,029

+5462.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 3000+ vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 3000+ vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 3000+

2001

Why buy it

✅Costs $47 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (450 vs 25,029).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.0 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌36.9% higher power demand at 89W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on 754, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +1773.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 4128.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 3.0 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 89W, a 24W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of 754 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
31.5% HIGHER MSRP
$196 MSRPvs$149 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Athlon 64 3000+?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1773.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 5462% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1773.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 5462% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in 31.5% more expensive on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1773.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 4128.3% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 3.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2001), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of 754, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 1/1. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Athlon 64 3000+ vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 3000+

The Athlon 64 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 450 points. Launch price was $65.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 3000+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 9 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3000+ versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 78.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F. The Athlon 64 3000+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3000+ scores 450 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 192.9% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 3000+ vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

Feature	Athlon 64 3000+	Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	10 / 16+900%
Boost Clock	2 GHz	4.6 GHz+130%
Base Clock	—	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	20 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K+40860%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	130 nm	Intel 7 nm-95%
Architecture	Clawhammer (2001−2005)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	450	25,029+5462%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,211
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,407
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,408

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 3000+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-400 on the Athlon 64 3000+ versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports -1300% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 4700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 3000+) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 939 (Athlon 64 3000+) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

Feature	Athlon 64 3000+	Core i5-13400F
Socket	754	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 5.0+355%
Max RAM Speed	DDR-400	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	192 GB+4700%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 3000+) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Athlon 64 3000+	Core i5-13400F
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 64 3000+ was priced at $149, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($149 vs $196), Athlon 64 3000+ was $47 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 3000+ delivers 3.0 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 190.8% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 64 3000+	Core i5-13400F
MSRP	$149-24%	$196
Performance per Dollar	3.0	127.7+4157%
Release Date	2001	2023

Search Athlon 64 3000+ on Amazon

Search Core i5-13400F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.