Athlon 64 3700+ vs Athlon 64 FX-51

Athlon 64 3700+ vs Athlon 64 FX-51 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 3700+

1 / 1

622

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon 64 FX-51

1 / 1

615

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 3700+ vs Athlon 64 FX-51 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 3700+ vs Athlon 64 FX-51: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 3700+

2001

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $461 less on MSRP ($272 MSRP vs $733 MSRP).
✅Delivers 172.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 0.8 PassMark/$ ($272 MSRP vs $733 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Athlon 64 FX-51

2003

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon 64 3700+ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (615 vs 622).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 2.3 PassMark/$ ($733 MSRP vs $272 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 3700+ better than Athlon 64 FX-51?

Yes. Athlon 64 3700+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 3700+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 3700+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 64 3700+ is the better buy right now. Athlon 64 3700+ comes in $461 cheaper on MSRP at $272 MSRP versus $733 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 172.6% better value on MSRP (2.3 vs 0.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon 64 FX-51 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2003 vs 2001). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 3700+ vs Athlon 64 FX-51 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 3700+

The Athlon 64 3700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 622 points. Launch price was $69.

Athlon 64 FX-51

The Athlon 64 FX-51 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 615 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 3700+ and Athlon 64 FX-51 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Athlon 64 3700+ versus 2.2 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-51 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3700+. The Athlon 64 3700+ uses the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Athlon 64 FX-51 uses SledgeHammer (2003−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3700+ scores 622 against the Athlon 64 FX-51's 615 — a 1.1% lead for the Athlon 64 3700+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon 64 3700+	Athlon 64 FX-51
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+9%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	130 nm	130 nm
Architecture	San Diego (2001−2005)	SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
PassMark	622+1%	615

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 3700+ uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon 64 FX-51 uses 940 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR-400 memory speed. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD 939 (Athlon 64 3700+) and AMD 940 (Athlon 64 FX-51).

Feature	Athlon 64 3700+	Athlon 64 FX-51
Socket	939	940
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR-400	DDR-400
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	0	0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 64 3700+ was priced at $272, while the Athlon 64 FX-51 came in at $733. On launch pricing ($272 vs $733), Athlon 64 3700+ was $461 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 3700+ delivers 2.3 pts/$ vs 0.8 pts/$ for the Athlon 64 FX-51 — making the Athlon 64 3700+ the 92.6% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 64 3700+	Athlon 64 FX-51
MSRP	$272-63%	$733
Performance per Dollar	2.3+187%	0.8
Release Date	2001	2003

Search Athlon 64 3700+ on Amazon

Search Athlon 64 FX-51 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.