Athlon 64 3700+ vs Turion 64 ML-44

Athlon 64 3700+ vs Turion 64 ML-44 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 3700+

1 / 1

622

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Turion 64 ML-44

1 / 1

645

+3.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 3700+ vs Turion 64 ML-44 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 3700+ vs Turion 64 ML-44: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 3700+

2001

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (622 vs 645).
❌Launch MSRP is still $272 MSRP, while Turion 64 ML-44 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌8800% higher power demand at 89W vs 1W.

Turion 64 ML-44

2006

Why buy it

✅+3.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 89W, a 88W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion 64 ML-44 better than Athlon 64 3700+?

Yes. Turion 64 ML-44 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 ML-44 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion 64 ML-44 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Turion 64 ML-44 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $272 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon 64 3700+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2001 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (2.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on 939.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Turion 64 ML-44 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2006 vs 2001) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 64 3700+ vs Turion 64 ML-44 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 3700+

The Athlon 64 3700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 622 points. Launch price was $69.

Turion 64 ML-44

The Turion 64 ML-44 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 645 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 3700+ and Turion 64 ML-44 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Athlon 64 3700+ versus 2.4 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-44 — identical boost frequencies. The Athlon 64 3700+ uses the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Turion 64 ML-44 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3700+ scores 622 against the Turion 64 ML-44's 645 — a 3.6% lead for the Turion 64 ML-44. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon 64 3700+	Turion 64 ML-44
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	130 nm	90 nm-31%
Architecture	San Diego (2001−2005)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	622	645+4%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 3700+ uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion 64 ML-44 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.