
Athlon 64 3700+

Pentium D 830
Athlon 64 3700+ vs Pentium D 830 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 64 3700+ vs Pentium D 830 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon 64 3700+ vs Pentium D 830: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 64 3700+
2001Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $44 less on MSRP ($272 MSRP vs $316 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 2.0 PassMark/$ ($272 MSRP vs $316 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 89W instead of 130W, a 41W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Pentium D 830.
Pentium D 830
2005Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Athlon 64 3700+.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon 64 3700+ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (618 vs 622).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 2.3 PassMark/$ ($316 MSRP vs $272 MSRP).
- ❌46.1% higher power demand at 130W vs 89W.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon 64 3700+ better than Pentium D 830?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 64 3700+ vs Pentium D 830 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 3700+
The Athlon 64 3700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 622 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium D 830
The Pentium D 830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 618 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon 64 3700+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium D 830 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium D 830 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Athlon 64 3700+ versus 3 GHz on the Pentium D 830 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Pentium D 830. The Athlon 64 3700+ uses the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Pentium D 830 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3700+ scores 622 against the Pentium D 830's 618 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon 64 3700+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3700+ | Pentium D 830 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 2 / 2+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3 GHz+25% |
| Base Clock | — | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Process | 130 nm | 90 nm-31% |
| Architecture | San Diego (2001−2005) | NetBurst (2000−2006) |
| PassMark | 622 | 618 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 151 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 341 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 3700+ uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium D 830 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-400 on the Athlon 64 3700+ versus DDR2-667 on the Pentium D 830 — the Pentium D 830 supports -266.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 3700+) vs 16 (Pentium D 830) — the Pentium D 830 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 939 (Athlon 64 3700+) and 945,955,975 (Pentium D 830).
| Feature | Athlon 64 3700+ | Pentium D 830 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 939 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-400 | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 3700+) / None (Pentium D 830). Primary use case: Pentium D 830 targets Legacy Desktop.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3700+ | Pentium D 830 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | None |
| Target Use | — | Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon 64 3700+ was priced at $272, while the Pentium D 830 came in at $316. On launch pricing ($272 vs $316), Athlon 64 3700+ was $44 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 3700+ delivers 2.3 pts/$ vs 2.0 pts/$ for the Pentium D 830 — making the Athlon 64 3700+ the 15.6% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 3700+ | Pentium D 830 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $272-14% | $316 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.3+15% | 2.0 |
| Release Date | 2001 | 2005 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















