Athlon 64 FX-51
VS
Sempron 150

Athlon 64 FX-51 vs Sempron 150

AMD

Athlon 64 FX-51

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2003
VS
AMD

Sempron 150

1 Cores1 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 FX-51 is positioned at rank 1133 and the Sempron 150 is on rank 810, so the Sempron 150 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 FX-51

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
371089%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
350643%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
254595%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
76699%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
60754%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
53148%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
30440%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
30043%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
27355%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
27352%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
27046%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
26317%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
25949%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
25844%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
25610%
#1133
Athlon 64 FX-51
MSRP: $733|Avg: $733
100%
#1134
Athlon 64 FX-55
MSRP: $827|Avg: $50
99%
#1135
Athlon 64 FX-53
MSRP: $799|Avg: $15
96%
#1136
Athlon XP 2000+
MSRP: $339|Avg: $40
88%
#1137
Athlon 64 FX-57
MSRP: $1031|Avg: $200
83%
#1138
Athlon XP 3000+
MSRP: $588|Avg: $20
82%
#1139
Athlon XP 2100+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $30
75%
#1140
Pentium III 1266S
MSRP: $369|Avg: $20
68%
#1141
Pentium 4 1.80
MSRP: $562|Avg: $40
48%
#1142
Pentium III 1133
MSRP: $990|Avg: $30
21%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Sempron 150

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16151%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15261%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11081%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3338%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2644%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2313%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1325%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1308%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1191%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1190%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1177%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1145%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1129%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1125%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1115%
#810
Sempron 150
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#812
Core i3-3250T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
99%
#813
Core i5-5575R
MSRP: $265|Avg: $50
99%
#815
Core i3-3210
MSRP: $117|Avg: $25
99%
#816
Celeron G3900E
MSRP: $107|Avg: $35
98%
#817
Athlon II X3 435
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
98%
#818
Core i7-6822EQ
MSRP: $294|Avg: $190
98%
#819
Athlon II X4 645
MSRP: $126|Avg: $20
98%
#820
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
97%
#821
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
96%
#822
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
96%
#823
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
96%
#824
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
96%
#825
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Sempron 150 (2010) utilizes 45 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAthlon 64 FX-51Sempron 150
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($733)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (SledgeHammer (2003−2005) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sargas (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon 64 FX-51 (2003) relies on 130 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAthlon 64 FX-51Sempron 150
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($733)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 FX-51 and Sempron 150

AMD

Athlon 64 FX-51

The Athlon 64 FX-51 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 615 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Sempron 150

The Sempron 150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 December 2010 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 579 points. Launch price was $73.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 FX-51 and Sempron 150 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-51 versus 2.9 GHz on the Sempron 150 — a 27.5% clock advantage for the Sempron 150. The Athlon 64 FX-51 uses the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Sempron 150 uses Sargas (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-51 scores 615 against the Sempron 150's 579 — a 6% lead for the Athlon 64 FX-51. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon 64 FX-51Sempron 150
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
2.9 GHz+32%
Base Clock
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB (per core)
Process
130 nm
45 nm-65%
Architecture
SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
Sargas (2009−2011)
PassMark
615+6%
579
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 FX-51 uses the 940 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 150 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon 64 FX-51Sempron 150
Socket
940
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR-400
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0