Athlon 64 FX-53 vs Celeron 1047UE
Athlon 64 FX-53
Celeron 1047UE
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 FX-53 is positioned at rank 1135 and the Celeron 1047UE is on rank 1170, so the Athlon 64 FX-53 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 FX-53
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1047UE
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 FX-53 | Celeron 1047UE |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($100) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 FX-53 | Celeron 1047UE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+537%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($100) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 FX-53 and Celeron 1047UE
Athlon 64 FX-53
The Athlon 64 FX-53 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Junho 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 645 points. Launch price was $30.
Celeron 1047UE
The Celeron 1047UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 675 points. Launch price was $134.
Processing Power
The Athlon 64 FX-53 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Celeron 1047UE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron 1047UE has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-53 versus 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 1047UE — a 52.6% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 FX-53. The Athlon 64 FX-53 uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Celeron 1047UE uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-53 scores 645 against the Celeron 1047UE's 675 — a 4.5% lead for the Celeron 1047UE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 350 vs 159, a 75% lead for the Athlon 64 FX-53 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 350 vs 293 (17.7% advantage for the Athlon 64 FX-53). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 FX-53 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1047UE.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-53 | Celeron 1047UE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 2 / 2+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz+71% | 1.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 130 nm | 22 nm-83% |
| Architecture | Clawhammer (2001−2005) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 645 | 675+5% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 350+120% | 159 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 350+19% | 293 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 FX-53 uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron 1047UE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-400 on the Athlon 64 FX-53 versus DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1047UE — the Celeron 1047UE supports -203% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 1047UE supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 FX-53) vs 16 (Celeron 1047UE) — the Celeron 1047UE offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: nForce3,nForce4,K8T800 (Athlon 64 FX-53) and BGA1023 (Celeron 1047UE).
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-53 | Celeron 1047UE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 939 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-400 | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 16 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Athlon 64 FX-53 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: None (Athlon 64 FX-53) vs VT-x (Celeron 1047UE). The Celeron 1047UE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Athlon 64 FX-53 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 64 FX-53 targets Legacy Desktop.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-53 | Celeron 1047UE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | None | VT-x |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Athlon 64 FX-53 launched at $799 MSRP, while the Celeron 1047UE debuted at $100. At current prices ($15 vs $100), the Athlon 64 FX-53 is $85 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 FX-53 delivers 43.0 pts/$ vs 6.8 pts/$ for the Celeron 1047UE — making the Athlon 64 FX-53 the 145.7% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-53 | Celeron 1047UE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $100-87% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-85% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.0+532% | 6.8 |
| Release Date | 2004 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 FX-53 and Celeron 1047UE
