Athlon 64 FX-53 vs Pentium T2330
Athlon 64 FX-53
Pentium T2330
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 FX-53 is positioned at rank 1135 and the Pentium T2330 is on rank 1220, so the Athlon 64 FX-53 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 FX-53
Performance Per Dollar Pentium T2330
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 FX-53 | Pentium T2330 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($7) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 FX-53 | Pentium T2330 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+121%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($7) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 FX-53 and Pentium T2330
Athlon 64 FX-53
The Athlon 64 FX-53 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Junho 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 645 points. Launch price was $30.
Pentium T2330
The Pentium T2330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon 64 FX-53 is built on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-53 scores 645 against the Pentium T2330's 665 — a 3.1% lead for the Pentium T2330. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 350 vs 223, a 44.3% lead for the Athlon 64 FX-53 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 350 vs 402 (13.8% advantage for the Pentium T2330). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 FX-53 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T2330.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-53 | Pentium T2330 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | — |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | — | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | — |
| Process | 130 nm | 65 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Clawhammer (2001−2005) | — |
| PassMark | 645 | 665+3% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 350+57% | 223 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 350 | 402+15% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 FX-53 uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium T2330 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-400 on the Athlon 64 FX-53 versus DDR2-533 on the Pentium T2330 — the Pentium T2330 supports -202% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 FX-53) vs 4 (Pentium T2330) — the Pentium T2330 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: nForce3,nForce4,K8T800 (Athlon 64 FX-53) and GL960 (Pentium T2330).
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-53 | Pentium T2330 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 939 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-400 | DDR2-533 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 4 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: None (Athlon 64 FX-53) vs No (Pentium T2330). Primary use case: Athlon 64 FX-53 targets Legacy Desktop.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-53 | Pentium T2330 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | None | No |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Athlon 64 FX-53 launched at $799 MSRP, while the Pentium T2330 debuted at $150. At current prices ($15 vs $7), the Pentium T2330 is $8 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 FX-53 delivers 43.0 pts/$ vs 95.0 pts/$ for the Pentium T2330 — making the Pentium T2330 the 75.4% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-53 | Pentium T2330 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $150-81% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $7-53% |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.0 | 95.0+121% |
| Release Date | 2004 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 FX-53 and Pentium T2330
