Athlon 64 X2 3600+ vs Core 2 Duo E6750
Athlon 64 X2 3600+
Core 2 Duo E6750
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 X2 3600+ is positioned at rank 1053 and the Core 2 Duo E6750 is on rank 1069, so the Athlon 64 X2 3600+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 3600+
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E6750
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 X2 3600+ | Core 2 Duo E6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Manchester (2005−2006) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 X2 3600+ | Core 2 Duo E6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+49%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 X2 3600+ and Core 2 Duo E6750
Athlon 64 X2 3600+
The Athlon 64 X2 3600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Manchester (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,020 points. Launch price was $149.
Core 2 Duo E6750
The Core 2 Duo E6750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,029 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 64 X2 3600+ and Core 2 Duo E6750 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 3600+ versus 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6750 — a 28.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E6750. The Athlon 64 X2 3600+ uses the Manchester (2005−2006) architecture (90 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 uses Conroe (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 3600+ scores 1,020 against the Core 2 Duo E6750's 1,029 — a 0.9% lead for the Core 2 Duo E6750. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 3600+ | Core 2 Duo E6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2.67 GHz+34% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.66 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 4 MB+1500% |
| Process | 90 nm | 65 nm-28% |
| Architecture | Manchester (2005−2006) | Conroe (2006−2007) |
| PassMark | 1,020 | 1,029 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 X2 3600+ uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 3600+ versus 1333 on the Core 2 Duo E6750 — the Core 2 Duo E6750 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 X2 3600+) vs 16 (Core 2 Duo E6750) — the Core 2 Duo E6750 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 3600+) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6750).
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 3600+ | Core 2 Duo E6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 939 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | 1333+66550% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+104857500% | 16 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 X2 3600+) / true (Core 2 Duo E6750). Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E6750 rivals Phenom X3 8450.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 3600+ | Core 2 Duo E6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
The Athlon 64 X2 3600+ launched at $150 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E6750 debuted at $183. At current prices ($10 vs $15), the Athlon 64 X2 3600+ is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 X2 3600+ delivers 102.0 pts/$ vs 68.6 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E6750 — making the Athlon 64 X2 3600+ the 39.2% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 3600+ | Core 2 Duo E6750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-18% | $183 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-33% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 102.0+49% | 68.6 |
| Release Date | 2005 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 X2 3600+ and Core 2 Duo E6750
