Athlon 64 X2 3600+ vs Core i3-330M

Athlon 64 X2 3600+ vs Core i3-330M Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 X2 3600+

2 / 2

1,020

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-330M

2 / 4

1,032

+1.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 X2 3600+ vs Core i3-330M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 X2 3600+ vs Core i3-330M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 X2 3600+

2005

Why buy it

✅Draws 89W instead of 512W, a 423W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,020 vs 1,032).
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core i3-330M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-330M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i3-330M

2010

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale), while Athlon 64 X2 3600+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌475.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 89W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 X2 3600+ better than Core i3-330M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon 64 X2 3600+ is ahead with a 1.8% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-330M pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-330M is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 64 X2 3600+ is the better buy right now. Athlon 64 X2 3600+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i3-330M is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-330M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2005) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 64 X2 3600+ vs Core i3-330M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 X2 3600+

The Athlon 64 X2 3600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Manchester (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,020 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i3-330M

The Core i3-330M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,032 points. Launch price was $49.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 X2 3600+ packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-330M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 3600+ versus 0.13 GHz on the Core i3-330M — a 175.6% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 3600+. The Athlon 64 X2 3600+ uses the Manchester (2005−2006) architecture (90 nm), while the Core i3-330M uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 3600+ scores 1,020 against the Core i3-330M's 1,032 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i3-330M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 3600+ vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-330M.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 3600+	Core i3-330M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2 GHz+1438%	0.13 GHz
Base Clock	—	2.13 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	90 nm	32 nm-64%
Architecture	Manchester (2005−2006)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,020	1,032+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	317
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	689

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 X2 3600+ uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-330M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 3600+ versus DDR3-1066 on the Core i3-330M — the Core i3-330M supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 X2 3600+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 X2 3600+) vs 16 (Core i3-330M) — the Core i3-330M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 3600+) and HM55,PM55,QM57 (Core i3-330M).

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 3600+	Core i3-330M
Socket	939	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	DDR3-1066+33%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 X2 3600+) / VT-x / EPT (Core i3-330M). The Core i3-330M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale)), while the Athlon 64 X2 3600+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-330M targets Legacy Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-330M rivals AMD Athlon II P320.