CPU
GPU
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
Athlon II X2 210e
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 X2 3800+ is positioned at rank 1094 and the Athlon II X2 210e is on rank 837, so the Athlon II X2 210e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 3800+
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 210e
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 X2 3800+ | Athlon II X2 210e |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($28) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Manchester (2005−2006) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 X2 3800+ | Athlon II X2 210e |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+41%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($28) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and Athlon II X2 210e
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
The Athlon 64 X2 3800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Manchester (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,095 points. Launch price was $149.
Athlon II X2 210e
The Athlon II X2 210e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,089 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and Athlon II X2 210e share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ versus 2.6 GHz on the Athlon II X2 210e — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 210e. The Athlon 64 X2 3800+ uses the Manchester (2005−2006) architecture (90 nm), while the Athlon II X2 210e uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ scores 1,095 against the Athlon II X2 210e's 1,089 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 3800+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 3800+ | Athlon II X2 210e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2.6 GHz+30% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512 kB |
| Process | 90 nm | 45 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Manchester (2005−2006) | Regor (2009−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,095 | 1,089 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 X2 3800+ uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon II X2 210e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ versus 1333 on the Athlon II X2 210e — the Athlon II X2 210e supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 3800+) and AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 210e).
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 3800+ | Athlon II X2 210e |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 939 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | 1333+66550% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+104857500% | 16 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 X2 3800+) / true (Athlon II X2 210e). Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 210e rivals Pentium E5300.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 3800+ | Athlon II X2 210e |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
The Athlon 64 X2 3800+ launched at $354 MSRP, while the Athlon II X2 210e debuted at $60. At current prices ($20 vs $28), the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ is $8 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ delivers 54.8 pts/$ vs 38.9 pts/$ for the Athlon II X2 210e — making the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ the 33.9% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 3800+ | Athlon II X2 210e |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $354 | $60-83% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-29% | $28 |
| Performance per Dollar | 54.8+41% | 38.9 |
| Release Date | 2005 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and Athlon II X2 210e
