Athlon 64 X2 3800+
VS
Core 2 Duo E8335

Athlon 64 X2 3800+ vs Core 2 Duo E8335

AMD

Athlon 64 X2 3800+

2 Cores2 Thrd89 WWMax: 2 GHz2005
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E8335

2 Cores2 Thrd44 WWMax: 0.93 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 X2 3800+ is positioned at rank 1094 and the Core 2 Duo E8335 is on rank 1196, so the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 3800+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
100879%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
95320%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
69210%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
20850%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
16516%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
14448%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
8275%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
8167%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
7436%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
7436%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
7352%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
7154%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
7054%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
7026%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
6962%
#1094
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $20
100%
#1095
Athlon 64 3000+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
98%
#1096
Athlon XP 3100+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
92%
#1097
Athlon 64 3300+
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
84%
#1098
Athlon 64 2800+
MSRP: $178|Avg: $15
76%
#1099
Athlon 64 3700+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $20
74%
#1100
Athlon 64 FX-72
MSRP: $799|Avg: $40
73%
#1101
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
MSRP: $581|Avg: $110
70%
#1102
Athlon 64 3500+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $10
68%
#1103
Pentium D 830
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
63%
#1104
Pentium D 960
MSRP: $523|Avg: $15
62%
#1105
Athlon XP 2500+
MSRP: $172|Avg: $15
60%
#1106
Athlon 64 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $10
59%
#1107
Pentium 4 2.53
MSRP: $193|Avg: $13
58%
#1108
Pentium 4 2.40
MSRP: $193|Avg: $193
54%
#1109
Athlon XP 2400+
MSRP: $193|Avg: $10
51%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E8335

#1184
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5364%
#1185
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5285%
#1186
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4852%
#1187
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4830%
#1188
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4786%
#1190
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4622%
#1191
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4431%
#1192
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4424%
#1193
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4305%
#1196
Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
100%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
98%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1201
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
96%
#1202
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#1203
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
93%
#1204
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
93%
#1205
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
93%
#1206
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
92%
#1207
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
91%
#1208
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
89%
#1209
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
89%
#1211
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon 64 X2 3800+ delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core 2 Duo E8335 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAthlon 64 X2 3800+Core 2 Duo E8335
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($20)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Manchester (2005−2006) / 90 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 60% cheaper ($20 vs $50) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightAthlon 64 X2 3800+Core 2 Duo E8335
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+150%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($20)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and Core 2 Duo E8335

AMD

Athlon 64 X2 3800+

The Athlon 64 X2 3800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Manchester (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,095 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E8335

The Core 2 Duo E8335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.933 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,094 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and Core 2 Duo E8335 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ versus 0.93 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8335 — a 73% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 3800+. The Athlon 64 X2 3800+ uses the Manchester (2005−2006) architecture (90 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E8335 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ scores 1,095 against the Core 2 Duo E8335's 1,094 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 3800+.

FeatureAthlon 64 X2 3800+Core 2 Duo E8335
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2 GHz+115%
0.93 GHz
Base Clock
2.933 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
6 MB (total)+1100%
Process
90 nm
45 nm-50%
Architecture
Manchester (2005−2006)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
1,095
1,094
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 X2 3800+ uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core 2 Duo E8335 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon 64 X2 3800+Core 2 Duo E8335
Socket
939
P
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
💰

Value Analysis

The Athlon 64 X2 3800+ launched at $354 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E8335 debuted at $200. At current prices ($20 vs $50), the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ is $30 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ delivers 54.8 pts/$ vs 21.9 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E8335 — making the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ the 85.8% better value option.

FeatureAthlon 64 X2 3800+Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP
$354
$200-44%
Avg Price (30d)
$20-60%
$50
Performance per Dollar
54.8+150%
21.9
Release Date
2005
2009