Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE vs Xeon E3-1240 v3

Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE vs Xeon E3-1240 v3 Performance Spectrum

Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE

4 / 4

7,006

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E3-1240 v3

4 / 8

7,001

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE vs Xeon E3-1240 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE vs Xeon E3-1240 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Xeon E3-1240 v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1240 v3 across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1240 v3, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1240 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E3-1240 v3

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.8% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,001 vs 7,006).
❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE better than Xeon E3-1240 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1240 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE is the better buy right now. Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $100 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E3-1240 v3 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 18.8% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (70.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE vs Xeon E3-1240 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,006 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1240 v3

The Xeon E3-1240 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,001 points. Launch price was $300.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1240 v3's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1240 v3 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E3-1240 v3 uses Haswell-WS (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE scores 7,006 against the Xeon E3-1240 v3's 7,001 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE vs 8192 kB (total) on the Xeon E3-1240 v3.

Feature	Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE	Xeon E3-1240 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	3.4 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8192 kB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	12 nm-45%	22 nm
Architecture	Picasso (2019−2022)	Haswell-WS (2013−2014)
PassMark	7,006	7,001

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1240 v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.