
Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE

Xeon E5-4640
Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE vs Xeon E5-4640 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE vs Xeon E5-4640 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE vs Xeon E5-4640: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,625 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $2,725 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2622.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 70.1 vs 2.6 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $2,725 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Xeon E5-4640 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4640 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,006 vs 7,012).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4640, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon E5-4640
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 70.1 PassMark/$ ($2,725 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-4640 better than Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE vs Xeon E5-4640 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,006 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-4640
The Xeon E5-4640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,012 points. Launch price was $2,730.
Processing Power
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-4640 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-4640 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-4640 — a 30.3% clock advantage for the Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-4640 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE scores 7,006 against the Xeon E5-4640's 7,012 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-4640. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-4640.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE | Xeon E5-4640 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+36% | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+38% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 20480 kB (total)+400% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-63% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Picasso (2019−2022) | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) |
| PassMark | 7,006 | 7,012 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4640 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE | Xeon E5-4640 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Xeon E5-4640 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE | Xeon E5-4640 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE was priced at $100, while the Xeon E5-4640 came in at $2725. On launch pricing ($100 vs $2725), Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE was $2625 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE delivers 70.1 pts/$ vs 2.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4640 — making the Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE the 185.8% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE | Xeon E5-4640 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-96% | $2725 |
| Performance per Dollar | 70.1+2596% | 2.6 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















