Athlon II X2 255 vs Pentium 997

AMD

Athlon II X2 255

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium 997

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2012

Athlon II X2 255 vs Pentium 997 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X2 255 vs Pentium 997 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X2 255 vs Pentium 997: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X2 255

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $74 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
  • Delivers 122.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 9.1 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Pentium 997.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,210 vs 1,215).
  • 282.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 17W.

Pentium 997

2012

Why buy it

  • +0.4% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 17W instead of 65W, a 48W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 20.2 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 255.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium 997 better than Athlon II X2 255?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II X2 255 is ahead with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 997 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 997 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium 997 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium 997 comes in 123.3% more expensive on MSRP at $134 MSRP versus $60 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. Athlon II X2 255 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 122.4% better value on paper (20.2 vs 9.1 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium 997 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II X2 255 vs Pentium 997 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon II X2 255

The Athlon II X2 255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,210 points. Launch price was $60.

Intel

Pentium 997

The Pentium 997 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,215 points. Launch price was $134.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II X2 255 and Pentium 997 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Athlon II X2 255 versus 1.6 GHz on the Pentium 997 — a 63.8% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 255 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Athlon II X2 255 uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium 997 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 255 scores 1,210 against the Pentium 997's 1,215 — a 0.4% lead for the Pentium 997. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 255 vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 997.

FeatureAthlon II X2 255Pentium 997
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz+94%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+94%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB
256K (per core)+25500%
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Regor (2009−2013)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,210
1,215
Geekbench 6 Single
265
Geekbench 6 Multi
500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X2 255 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium 997 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon II X2 255Pentium 997
Socket
AM3
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II X2 255) / not specified (Pentium 997). Primary use case: Athlon II X2 255 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 255 rivals Pentium E5700.

FeatureAthlon II X2 255Pentium 997
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Legacy Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X2 255 was priced at $60, while the Pentium 997 came in at $134. On launch pricing ($60 vs $134), Athlon II X2 255 was $74 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 255 delivers 20.2 pts/$ vs 9.1 pts/$ for the Pentium 997 — making the Athlon II X2 255 the 75.9% better value option.

FeatureAthlon II X2 255Pentium 997
MSRP
$60-55%
$134
Performance per Dollar
20.2+122%
9.1
Release Date
2010
2012

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.