Athlon II X2 260u vs Athlon X2 BE-2350
Athlon II X2 260u
Athlon X2 BE-2350
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X2 260u is positioned at rank 873 and the Athlon X2 BE-2350 is on rank 984, so the Athlon II X2 260u offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 260u
Performance Per Dollar Athlon X2 BE-2350
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon II X2 260u | Athlon X2 BE-2350 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Brisbane (2007−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon II X2 260u | Athlon X2 BE-2350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+2%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X2 260u and Athlon X2 BE-2350
Athlon II X2 260u
The Athlon II X2 260u is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 990 points. Launch price was $83.
Athlon X2 BE-2350
The Athlon X2 BE-2350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 975 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II X2 260u and Athlon X2 BE-2350 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Athlon II X2 260u versus 2.1 GHz on the Athlon X2 BE-2350 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 BE-2350. The Athlon II X2 260u uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon X2 BE-2350 uses Brisbane (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 260u scores 990 against the Athlon X2 BE-2350's 975 — a 1.5% lead for the Athlon II X2 260u. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 260u | Athlon X2 BE-2350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.1 GHz+17% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 45 nm-31% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Regor (2009−2013) | Brisbane (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 990+2% | 975 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X2 260u uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X2 BE-2350 uses AM2 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Athlon II X2 260u versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon X2 BE-2350 — the Athlon II X2 260u supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 260u) and AMD AM2 (Athlon X2 BE-2350).
| Feature | Athlon II X2 260u | Athlon X2 BE-2350 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333+66550% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 16 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Athlon II X2 260u) / not specified (Athlon X2 BE-2350). Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 260u rivals Core 2 Duo SU9400.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 260u | Athlon X2 BE-2350 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
The Athlon II X2 260u launched at $60 MSRP, while the Athlon X2 BE-2350 debuted at $90. At current prices ($10 vs $10), the Athlon X2 BE-2350 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 260u delivers 99.0 pts/$ vs 97.5 pts/$ for the Athlon X2 BE-2350 — making the Athlon II X2 260u the 1.5% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 260u | Athlon X2 BE-2350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-33% | $90 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | 99.0+2% | 97.5 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II X2 260u and Athlon X2 BE-2350
