Athlon II X2 260u vs Celeron 1019Y

Athlon II X2 260u vs Celeron 1019Y Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X2 260u

2 / 2

990

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron 1019Y

2 / 2

1,005

+1.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X2 260u vs Celeron 1019Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X2 260u vs Celeron 1019Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X2 260u

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 25W instead of 512W, a 487W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Celeron 1019Y.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (990 vs 1,005).
❌Launch MSRP is still $60 MSRP, while Celeron 1019Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1019Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Celeron 1019Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Athlon II X2 260u needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌1948% higher power demand at 512W vs 25W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 260u.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X2 260u better than Celeron 1019Y?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II X2 260u is ahead with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1019Y pulls ahead with 1.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1019Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X2 260u is the better buy right now. Athlon II X2 260u comes in at an unclear MSRP at $60 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron 1019Y is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.5% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 1019Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II X2 260u vs Celeron 1019Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X2 260u

The Athlon II X2 260u is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 990 points. Launch price was $83.

Celeron 1019Y

The Celeron 1019Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $153.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II X2 260u and Celeron 1019Y share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Athlon II X2 260u versus 1 GHz on the Celeron 1019Y — a 57.1% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 260u. The Athlon II X2 260u uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron 1019Y uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 260u scores 990 against the Celeron 1019Y's 1,005 — a 1.5% lead for the Celeron 1019Y. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 260u vs 2 MB on the Celeron 1019Y.

Feature	Athlon II X2 260u	Celeron 1019Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz+80%	1 GHz
Base Clock	—	1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	512 kB
Process	45 nm	22 nm-51%
Architecture	Regor (2009−2013)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	990	1,005+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X2 260u uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 1019Y uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Athlon II X2 260u versus DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1019Y — the Celeron 1019Y supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 1019Y supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X2 260u) vs 16 (Celeron 1019Y) — the Celeron 1019Y offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 260u) and HM77,UM77,HM76,HM75 (Celeron 1019Y).

Feature	Athlon II X2 260u	Celeron 1019Y
Socket	AM3	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1333	DDR3-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon II X2 260u) vs VT-x (Celeron 1019Y). The Celeron 1019Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Athlon II X2 260u requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 1019Y targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 260u rivals Core 2 Duo SU9400; Celeron 1019Y rivals Pentium 2117U.