Athlon II X2 260u
VS
Core i7-9700K

Athlon II X2 260u vs Core i7-9700K

AMD

Athlon II X2 260u

2 Cores2 Thrd25 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Athlon II X2 260u is positioned at rank #873 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 260u

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
18892%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
17851%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12961%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3905%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3093%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2706%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1550%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1529%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1393%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1392%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1377%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1340%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1321%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1316%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1304%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
100%
#873
Athlon II X2 260u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
100%
#875
A4-3420
MSRP: $65|Avg: $30
100%
#876
Core i5-5675R
MSRP: $339|Avg: $392
99%
#877
Core i5-3335S
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
99%
#878
Pentium G3470
MSRP: $150|Avg: $130
99%
#879
Core i5-3470T
MSRP: $184|Avg: $35
99%
#881
Pentium G6960
MSRP: $89|Avg: $15
98%
#882
Core i5-2500T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
98%
#884
Athlon II X2 265
MSRP: $83|Avg: $15
97%
#885
Core i3-2100
MSRP: $117|Avg: $10
96%
#886
A8-3800
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
96%
#887
Pentium E5200
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
95%
#888
Athlon II X2 235e
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-9700K

#259
Core i3-9100TE
MSRP: $122|Avg: $60
106%
#260
Core i5-12500T
MSRP: $302|Avg: $214
106%
#261
Core i9-13900
MSRP: $549|Avg: $599
105%
#262
Core i7-11700
MSRP: $323|Avg: $274
105%
#262
Core i7-8700K
MSRP: $359|Avg: $160
53%
#263
Core i9-13900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $570
104%
#264
Processor 300T
MSRP: $82|Avg: $82
103%
#265
Athlon 3000G
MSRP: $49|Avg: $60
103%
#266
Athlon 220GE
MSRP: $65|Avg: $60
103%
#267
Ryzen 9 3900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $441
102%
#268
Core i5-10500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $178
102%
#269
Celeron G6900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
102%
#270
Core i9-10850K
MSRP: $453|Avg: $300
102%
#271
Core i9-13900E
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
101%
#272
Core i9-9820X
MSRP: $889|Avg: $280
101%
#273
Core i9-9900X
MSRP: $989|Avg: $300
100%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
45%
#274
Core i7-9700K
MSRP: $385|Avg: $200
100%
#275
Core i3-10320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $140
99%
#276
Core i5-9600KF
MSRP: $262|Avg: $150
99%
#277
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
MSRP: $180|Avg: $180
98%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
43%
#278
Core i7-14701TE
MSRP: $392|Avg: $390
98%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
40%
#279
Core i9-11900KF
MSRP: $513|Avg: $349
98%
#280
Athlon Silver 3050GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $65
97%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
40%
#281
Core i7-9700E
MSRP: $259|Avg: $180
97%
#282
Core i7-11700K
MSRP: $399|Avg: $350
97%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
38%
#283
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i7-9700K (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAthlon II X2 260uCore i7-9700K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon II X2 260u (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAthlon II X2 260uCore i7-9700K
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+38%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X2 260u and Core i7-9700K

AMD

Athlon II X2 260u

The Athlon II X2 260u is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 990 points. Launch price was $83.

Intel

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Processing Power

The Athlon II X2 260u packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i7-9700K offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Athlon II X2 260u versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K — a 92.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K. The Athlon II X2 260u uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i7-9700K uses Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 260u scores 990 against the Core i7-9700K's 14,397 — a 174.3% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 260u vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K.

FeatureAthlon II X2 260uCore i7-9700K
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
8 / 8+300%
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
4.9 GHz+172%
Base Clock
3.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256K (per core)
Process
45 nm
14 nm-69%
Architecture
Regor (2009−2013)
Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
PassMark
990
14,397+1354%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X2 260u uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-9700K uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Athlon II X2 260u versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K — the Athlon II X2 260u supports 198.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X2 260u) vs 16 (Core i7-9700K) — the Core i7-9700K offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 260u) and Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K).

FeatureAthlon II X2 260uCore i7-9700K
Socket
AM3
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
1333+33225%
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
16
128 GB+838860700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Athlon II X2 260u) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Athlon II X2 260u requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 260u rivals Core 2 Duo SU9400.

FeatureAthlon II X2 260uCore i7-9700K
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Athlon II X2 260u launched at $60 MSRP, while the Core i7-9700K debuted at $385. At current prices ($10 vs $200), the Athlon II X2 260u is $190 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 260u delivers 99.0 pts/$ vs 72.0 pts/$ for the Core i7-9700K — making the Athlon II X2 260u the 31.6% better value option.

FeatureAthlon II X2 260uCore i7-9700K
MSRP
$60-84%
$385
Avg Price (30d)
$10-95%
$200
Performance per Dollar
99.0+38%
72.0
Release Date
2009
2018