
Athlon II X2 265

Athlon II X3 405e
Athlon II X2 265 vs Athlon II X3 405e Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X2 265 vs Athlon II X3 405e FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X2 265 vs Athlon II X3 405e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X2 265
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $17 less on MSRP ($83 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 19.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.0 vs 13.3 PassMark/$ ($83 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Athlon II X3 405e.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,324 vs 1,331).
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Athlon II X3 405e
2009Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.3 vs 16.0 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $83 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 265.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X2 265 better than Athlon II X3 405e?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X2 265 vs Athlon II X3 405e Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X2 265
The Athlon II X2 265 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,324 points. Launch price was $83.

Athlon II X3 405e
The Athlon II X3 405e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,331 points. Launch price was $80.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X2 265 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon II X3 405e offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Athlon II X3 405e has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Athlon II X2 265 versus 2.3 GHz on the Athlon II X3 405e — a 35.7% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 265 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Athlon II X2 265 uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon II X3 405e uses Rana (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 265 scores 1,324 against the Athlon II X3 405e's 1,331 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon II X3 405e. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 265 | Athlon II X3 405e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 3 / 3+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz+43% | 2.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+43% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Regor (2009−2013) | Rana (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,324 | 1,331 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 275 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 520 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM3 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Athlon II X3 405e supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 760G,780G,785G,790GX,870,880G,890GX,890FX (Athlon II X2 265) and AMD AM3 (Athlon II X3 405e).
| Feature | Athlon II X2 265 | Athlon II X3 405e |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II X2 265) / not specified (Athlon II X3 405e). Primary use case: Athlon II X2 265 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 265 rivals Pentium E6700.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 265 | Athlon II X3 405e |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X2 265 was priced at $83, while the Athlon II X3 405e came in at $100. On launch pricing ($83 vs $100), Athlon II X2 265 was $17 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 265 delivers 16.0 pts/$ vs 13.3 pts/$ for the Athlon II X3 405e — making the Athlon II X2 265 the 18.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 265 | Athlon II X3 405e |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $83-17% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.0+20% | 13.3 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2009 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















