Athlon II X2 265 vs Athlon Neo X2 L335

Athlon II X2 265 vs Athlon Neo X2 L335 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X2 265

2 / 2

1,324

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon Neo X2 L335

2 / 2

1,331

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X2 265 vs Athlon Neo X2 L335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X2 265 vs Athlon Neo X2 L335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X2 265

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Athlon Neo X2 L335.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,324 vs 1,331).
❌
3.8% HIGHER MSRP
$83 MSRPvs$80 MSRP

Athlon Neo X2 L335

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $3 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $83 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 265.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X2 265 better than Athlon Neo X2 L335?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II X2 265 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Neo X2 L335 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Neo X2 L335 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X2 265 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Athlon II X2 265 comes in 3.8% more expensive on MSRP at $83 MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon Neo X2 L335 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 4.3% better value on paper (16.6 vs 16.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on ASB1.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon II X2 265 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II X2 265 vs Athlon Neo X2 L335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X2 265

The Athlon II X2 265 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,324 points. Launch price was $83.

Athlon Neo X2 L335

The Athlon Neo X2 L335 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,331 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II X2 265 and Athlon Neo X2 L335 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Athlon II X2 265 versus 1.6 GHz on the Athlon Neo X2 L335 — a 69.4% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 265. The Athlon II X2 265 uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses Congo (2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 265 scores 1,324 against the Athlon Neo X2 L335's 1,331 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon Neo X2 L335.

Feature	Athlon II X2 265	Athlon Neo X2 L335
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+106%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	512 kB
Process	45 nm-31%	65 nm
Architecture	Regor (2009−2013)	Congo (2009)
PassMark	1,324	1,331
Geekbench 6 Single	275	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	520	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X2 265 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses ASB1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X2 265 versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon Neo X2 L335 — the Athlon II X2 265 supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X2 265 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 760G,780G,785G,790GX,870,880G,890GX,890FX (Athlon II X2 265) and AMD ASB1 (Athlon Neo X2 L335).

Feature	Athlon II X2 265	Athlon Neo X2 L335
Socket	AM3	ASB1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+67%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II X2 265) / not specified (Athlon Neo X2 L335). Primary use case: Athlon II X2 265 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 265 rivals Pentium E6700.

Feature	Athlon II X2 265	Athlon Neo X2 L335
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Legacy Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X2 265 was priced at $83, while the Athlon Neo X2 L335 came in at $80. On launch pricing ($83 vs $80), Athlon Neo X2 L335 was $3 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 265 delivers 16.0 pts/$ vs 16.6 pts/$ for the Athlon Neo X2 L335 — making the Athlon Neo X2 L335 the 4.2% better value option.

Feature	Athlon II X2 265	Athlon Neo X2 L335
MSRP	$83	$80-4%
Performance per Dollar	16.0	16.6+4%
Release Date	2010	2009

Search Athlon II X2 265 on Amazon

Search Athlon Neo X2 L335 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.