Athlon II X2 280
VS
A8-4555M

Athlon II X2 280 vs A8-4555M

AMD

Athlon II X2 280

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2013
VS
AMD

A8-4555M

4 Cores4 Thrd19 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X2 280 is positioned at rank 638 and the A8-4555M is on rank 826, so the Athlon II X2 280 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 280

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11502%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10869%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7892%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2377%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1883%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1647%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
944%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
931%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
848%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
848%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
838%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
816%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
804%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
801%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
794%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#638
Athlon II X2 280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
100%
#639
FX-8300
MSRP: $197|Avg: $50
100%
#640
Celeron G540T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
100%
#641
Core i5-6600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $90
100%
#642
Core i5-4460
MSRP: $182|Avg: $40
100%
#645
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
99%
#646
FX-8370E
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
99%
#647
Core i5-4590S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $45
99%
#648
Pentium G2020
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#649
Pentium G3450
MSRP: $82|Avg: $25
98%
#650
Core i7-6700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $143
98%
#651
Athlon II X4 631
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#652
Pentium G3240T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#653
Core i3-4160T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $18
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A8-4555M

#814
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1313%
#815
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1294%
#816
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1187%
#817
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1182%
#818
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1171%
#820
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1131%
#821
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1085%
#822
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1083%
#823
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1054%
#826
A8-4555M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#828
Celeron M 575
MSRP: $86|Avg: $12
100%
#829
Core i7-10710U
MSRP: $415|Avg: N/A
100%
#835
FX-9830P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
98%
#836
Celeron M P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#838
Celeron 887
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon II X2 280 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the A8-4555M in both compute-intensive tasks (1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAthlon II X2 280A8-4555M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAthlon II X2 280A8-4555M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X2 280 and A8-4555M

AMD

Athlon II X2 280

The Athlon II X2 280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 February 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,355 points. Launch price was $100.

AMD

A8-4555M

The A8-4555M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 19 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,341 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

The Athlon II X2 280 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A8-4555M offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A8-4555M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Athlon II X2 280 versus 2.4 GHz on the A8-4555M — a 40% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 280 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Athlon II X2 280 uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the A8-4555M uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 280 scores 1,355 against the A8-4555M's 1,341 — a 1% lead for the Athlon II X2 280. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon II X2 280A8-4555M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+50%
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+125%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
4 MB (total)+300%
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Regor (2009−2013)
Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,355+1%
1,341
Geekbench 6 Single
290
Geekbench 6 Multi
550
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X2 280 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A8-4555M uses FP2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X2 280 versus 1333 on the A8-4555M — the A8-4555M supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X2 280) vs 16 (A8-4555M) — the A8-4555M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 870,880G,890GX,890FX,970,990X,990FX (Athlon II X2 280) and FP2 (A8-4555M).

FeatureAthlon II X2 280A8-4555M
Socket
AM3
FP2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
1333+44333%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+104857500%
16
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X2 280) vs true (A8-4555M). The A8-4555M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7600G), while the Athlon II X2 280 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X2 280 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 280 rivals Pentium E6700; A8-4555M rivals Core i3-2367M.

FeatureAthlon II X2 280A8-4555M
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7600G
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
true
Target Use
Legacy Desktop