Athlon II X2 280
VS
Core Duo T2300

Athlon II X2 280 vs Core Duo T2300

AMD

Athlon II X2 280

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core Duo T2300

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.66 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X2 280 is positioned at rank 638 and the Core Duo T2300 is on rank 55, so the Core Duo T2300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 280

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11502%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10869%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7892%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2377%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1883%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1647%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
944%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
931%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
848%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
848%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
838%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
816%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
804%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
801%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
794%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#638
Athlon II X2 280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
100%
#639
FX-8300
MSRP: $197|Avg: $50
100%
#640
Celeron G540T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
100%
#641
Core i5-6600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $90
100%
#642
Core i5-4460
MSRP: $182|Avg: $40
100%
#645
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
99%
#646
FX-8370E
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
99%
#647
Core i5-4590S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $45
99%
#648
Pentium G2020
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#649
Pentium G3450
MSRP: $82|Avg: $25
98%
#650
Core i7-6700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $143
98%
#651
Athlon II X4 631
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#652
Pentium G3240T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#653
Core i3-4160T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $18
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Duo T2300

#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
97%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#43
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
213%
#44
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
209%
#45
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
192%
#46
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
191%
#47
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
190%
#49
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
183%
#50
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
176%
#51
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
175%
#52
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
171%
#55
Core Duo T2300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#65
Core i5-3320M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#66
Core i7-4510U
MSRP: $393|Avg: N/A
95%
#69
Core 2 Quad Q9100
MSRP: $14|Avg: $14
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Athlon II X2 280 (2013) utilizes 45 nm technology and DDR2, DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAthlon II X2 280Core Duo T2300
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Duo T2300 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR1, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAthlon II X2 280Core Duo T2300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X2 280 and Core Duo T2300

AMD

Athlon II X2 280

The Athlon II X2 280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 February 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,355 points. Launch price was $100.

Intel

Core Duo T2300

The Core Duo T2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,380 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II X2 280 and Core Duo T2300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Athlon II X2 280 versus 1.66 GHz on the Core Duo T2300 — a 73.8% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 280 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.66 GHz). The Athlon II X2 280 uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Core Duo T2300 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 280 scores 1,355 against the Core Duo T2300's 1,380 — a 1.8% lead for the Core Duo T2300. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon II X2 280Core Duo T2300
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+117%
1.66 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+117%
1.66 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
Process
45 nm-31%
65 nm
Architecture
Regor (2009−2013)
Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark
1,355
1,380+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
290
Geekbench 6 Multi
550
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X2 280 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core Duo T2300 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon II X2 280Core Duo T2300
Socket
AM3
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II X2 280) / not specified (Core Duo T2300). Primary use case: Athlon II X2 280 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 280 rivals Pentium E6700.

FeatureAthlon II X2 280Core Duo T2300
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Legacy Desktop