Athlon II X2 280 vs Core i3-2370M
Athlon II X2 280
Core i3-2370M
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X2 280 is positioned at rank 638 and the Core i3-2370M is on rank 1186, so the Athlon II X2 280 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 280
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-2370M
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon II X2 280 | Core i3-2370M |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($225) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon II X2 280 | Core i3-2370M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1384%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($225) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X2 280 and Core i3-2370M
Athlon II X2 280
The Athlon II X2 280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 February 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,355 points. Launch price was $100.
Core i3-2370M
The Core i3-2370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,370 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X2 280 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2370M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Athlon II X2 280 versus 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-2370M — a 40% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 280 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Athlon II X2 280 uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-2370M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 280 scores 1,355 against the Core i3-2370M's 1,370 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i3-2370M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 290 vs 412, a 34.8% lead for the Core i3-2370M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 550 vs 711 (25.5% advantage for the Core i3-2370M). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 280 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2370M.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 280 | Core i3-2370M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz+50% | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+50% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Regor (2009−2013) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,355 | 1,370+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 290 | 412+42% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 550 | 711+29% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X2 280 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-2370M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X2 280) vs 16 (Core i3-2370M) — the Core i3-2370M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 870,880G,890GX,890FX,970,990X,990FX (Athlon II X2 280) and HM65,HM67,QM67 (Core i3-2370M).
| Feature | Athlon II X2 280 | Core i3-2370M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X2 280) vs VT-x (Core i3-2370M). The Core i3-2370M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Athlon II X2 280 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X2 280 targets Legacy Desktop, Core i3-2370M targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 280 rivals Pentium E6700.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 280 | Core i3-2370M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | Laptop |
Value Analysis
The Athlon II X2 280 launched at $50 MSRP, while the Core i3-2370M debuted at $225.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 280 | Core i3-2370M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-78% | $225 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | — |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II X2 280 and Core i3-2370M
