Athlon II X2 280 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58

Athlon II X2 280 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X2 280

2 / 2

1,355

+1.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

2 / 2

1,339

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X2 280 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X2 280 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X2 280

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Turion 64 X2 TL-58.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Turion 64 X2 TL-58 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

2007

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon II X2 280 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,339 vs 1,355).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 280.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X2 280 better than Turion 64 X2 TL-58?

Yes. Athlon II X2 280 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon II X2 280 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X2 280 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X2 280 is the better buy right now. Athlon II X2 280 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $50 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (27.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon II X2 280 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II X2 280 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X2 280

The Athlon II X2 280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 February 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,355 points. Launch price was $100.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

The Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tyler (2007−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,339 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II X2 280 and Turion 64 X2 TL-58 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Athlon II X2 280 versus 1.9 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 — a 61.8% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 280. The Athlon II X2 280 uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 uses Tyler (2007−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 280 scores 1,355 against the Turion 64 X2 TL-58's 1,339 — a 1.2% lead for the Athlon II X2 280.

Feature	Athlon II X2 280	Turion 64 X2 TL-58
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+89%	1.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	45 nm-31%	65 nm
Architecture	Regor (2009−2013)	Tyler (2007−2009)
PassMark	1,355+1%	1,339
Geekbench 6 Single	290	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	550	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II X2 280) / not specified (Turion 64 X2 TL-58). Primary use case: Athlon II X2 280 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 280 rivals Pentium E6700.