Athlon II X3 415e vs Celeron N2810

Athlon II X3 415e vs Celeron N2810 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X3 415e

3 / 3

1,481

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N2810

2 / 2

1,474

0.0%

Celeron J1800

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

Pentium Dual Core T4200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X3 415e vs Celeron N2810 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X3 415e vs Celeron N2810: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X3 415e

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $75 MSRP, while Celeron N2810 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌542.9% higher power demand at 45W vs 7W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2810 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Celeron N2810

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 45W, a 38W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Athlon II X3 415e needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,474 vs 1,481).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X3 415e better than Celeron N2810?

Yes. Athlon II X3 415e is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon II X3 415e is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X3 415e is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 3 cores and 3 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X3 415e is the better buy right now. Athlon II X3 415e comes in at an unclear MSRP at $75 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (19.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2810 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II X3 415e vs Celeron N2810 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X3 415e

The Athlon II X3 415e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,481 points. Launch price was $75.

Celeron N2810

The Celeron N2810 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,474 points. Launch price was $260.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II X3 415e packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Celeron N2810 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II X3 415e has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Athlon II X3 415e versus 2 GHz on the Celeron N2810 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 415e (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Athlon II X3 415e uses the Rana (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron N2810 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X3 415e scores 1,481 against the Celeron N2810's 1,474 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon II X3 415e. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon II X3 415e	Celeron N2810
Cores / Threads	3 / 3+50%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+25%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+25%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	45 nm	22 nm-51%
Architecture	Rana (2009−2011)	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,481	1,474

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X3 415e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N2810 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X3 415e versus 1066 on the Celeron N2810 — the Athlon II X3 415e supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X3 415e supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X3 415e) vs 4 (Celeron N2810) — the Celeron N2810 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM3 (Athlon II X3 415e) and FCBGA1170 (Celeron N2810).

Feature	Athlon II X3 415e	Celeron N2810
Socket	AM3	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+25%	1066
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+300%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon II X3 415e) / true (Celeron N2810). The Celeron N2810 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Athlon II X3 415e requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N2810 rivals AMD A4-1250.