Athlon II X3 415e vs Core i5-4300Y

Athlon II X3 415e vs Core i5-4300Y Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X3 415e

3 / 3

1,481

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-4300Y

2 / 4

1,485

+0.3%

Celeron J1800

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X3 415e vs Core i5-4300Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X3 415e vs Core i5-4300Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X3 415e

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 512W, a 467W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,481 vs 1,485).
❌Launch MSRP is still $75 MSRP, while Core i5-4300Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i5-4300Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌1037.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X3 415e better than Core i5-4300Y?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II X3 415e is ahead with a 2.3% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4300Y pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4300Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X3 415e is the better buy right now. Athlon II X3 415e comes in at an unclear MSRP at $75 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-4300Y is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (19.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4300Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 3/3. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II X3 415e vs Core i5-4300Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X3 415e

The Athlon II X3 415e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,481 points. Launch price was $75.

Core i5-4300Y

The Core i5-4300Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,485 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II X3 415e packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Core i5-4300Y offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X3 415e has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Athlon II X3 415e versus 2.3 GHz on the Core i5-4300Y — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 415e (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Athlon II X3 415e uses the Rana (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-4300Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X3 415e scores 1,481 against the Core i5-4300Y's 1,485 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-4300Y. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X3 415e vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4300Y.

Feature	Athlon II X3 415e	Core i5-4300Y
Cores / Threads	3 / 3+50%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+9%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+56%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB
Process	45 nm	22 nm-51%
Architecture	Rana (2009−2011)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,481	1,485

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X3 415e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-4300Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.