Athlon II X3 415e vs Turion II P560

Athlon II X3 415e vs Turion II P560 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X3 415e

3 / 3

1,481

+1.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Turion II P560

2 / 2

1,455

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X3 415e vs Turion II P560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X3 415e vs Turion II P560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X3 415e

2010

Why buy it

✅+1.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $75 MSRP, while Turion II P560 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2150% higher power demand at 45W vs 2W.

Turion II P560

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 45W, a 43W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,455 vs 1,481).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X3 415e better than Turion II P560?

Yes. Athlon II X3 415e is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X3 415e is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 3 cores and 3 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X3 415e is the better buy right now. Athlon II X3 415e comes in at an unclear MSRP at $75 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (19.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon II X3 415e makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 3 cores / 3 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II X3 415e vs Turion II P560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X3 415e

The Athlon II X3 415e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,481 points. Launch price was $75.

Turion II P560

The Turion II P560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,455 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II X3 415e packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Turion II P560 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II X3 415e has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Athlon II X3 415e versus 2.5 GHz on the Turion II P560 — identical boost frequencies. The Athlon II X3 415e uses the Rana (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Turion II P560 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X3 415e scores 1,481 against the Turion II P560's 1,455 — a 1.8% lead for the Athlon II X3 415e.

Feature	Athlon II X3 415e	Turion II P560
Cores / Threads	3 / 3+50%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	2.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB+300%
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Rana (2009−2011)	Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,481+2%	1,455

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X3 415e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion II P560 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.