Athlon II X3 425e vs Celeron G3930TE

CPU

GPU

Athlon II X3 425e

3 Cores3 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2011

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Celeron G3930TE

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2017

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Athlon II X3 425e vs Celeron G3930TE Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X3 425e

3 / 3

2,239

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G3930TE

2 / 2

2,218

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X3 425e vs Celeron G3930TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X3 425e vs Celeron G3930TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X3 425e

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 28.3 vs 52.8 PassMark/$ ($79 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3930TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Celeron G3930TE

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $37 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
✅Delivers 86.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 28.3 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 610, while Athlon II X3 425e needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon II X3 425e across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,218 vs 2,239).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X3 425e better than Celeron G3930TE?

Yes. Athlon II X3 425e is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon II X3 425e is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X3 425e is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 3 cores and 3 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X3 425e is still the much better call for a fresh build. Athlon II X3 425e comes in 88.1% more expensive on MSRP at $79 MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G3930TE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 86.3% better value on paper (52.8 vs 28.3 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3930TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II X3 425e vs Celeron G3930TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X3 425e

The Athlon II X3 425e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,239 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron G3930TE

The Celeron G3930TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,218 points. Launch price was $42.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II X3 425e packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Celeron G3930TE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II X3 425e has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Athlon II X3 425e versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930TE — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Athlon II X3 425e uses the Rana (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G3930TE uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X3 425e scores 2,239 against the Celeron G3930TE's 2,218 — a 0.9% lead for the Athlon II X3 425e. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X3 425e vs 2 MB on the Celeron G3930TE.

Feature	Athlon II X3 425e	Celeron G3930TE
Cores / Threads	3 / 3+50%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	2.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB
Process	45 nm	14 nm-69%
Architecture	Rana (2009−2011)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,239	2,218
Geekbench 6 Single	—	548
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	948

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X3 425e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G3930TE uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X3 425e versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G3930TE — the Celeron G3930TE supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3930TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X3 425e) vs 16 (Celeron G3930TE) — the Celeron G3930TE offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM3 (Athlon II X3 425e) and H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3930TE).

Feature	Athlon II X3 425e	Celeron G3930TE
Socket	AM3	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR4-2400+80%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	64 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon II X3 425e) / VT-x (Celeron G3930TE). The Celeron G3930TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Athlon II X3 425e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930TE rivals Pentium G4560T.

Feature	Athlon II X3 425e	Celeron G3930TE
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	HD Graphics 610
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X3 425e was priced at $79, while the Celeron G3930TE came in at $42. On launch pricing ($79 vs $42), Celeron G3930TE was $37 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X3 425e delivers 28.3 pts/$ vs 52.8 pts/$ for the Celeron G3930TE — making the Celeron G3930TE the 60.3% better value option.

Feature	Athlon II X3 425e	Celeron G3930TE
MSRP	$79	$42-47%
Performance per Dollar	28.3	52.8+87%
Release Date	2011	2017

Search Athlon II X3 425e on Amazon

Search Celeron G3930TE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.