Athlon II X3 425e vs Core i5-8200Y

Athlon II X3 425e vs Core i5-8200Y Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X3 425e

3 / 3

2,239

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-8200Y

2 / 4

2,245

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X3 425e vs Core i5-8200Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X3 425e vs Core i5-8200Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X3 425e

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,239 vs 2,245).
❌Launch MSRP is still $79 MSRP, while Core i5-8200Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌800% higher power demand at 45W vs 5W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-8200Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-8200Y

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 5W instead of 45W, a 40W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (10 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 615, while Athlon II X3 425e needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-8200Y better than Athlon II X3 425e?

Yes. Core i5-8200Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-8200Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-8200Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-8200Y is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-8200Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $79 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon II X3 425e only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (28.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-8200Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 3/3. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II X3 425e vs Core i5-8200Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X3 425e

The Athlon II X3 425e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,239 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-8200Y

The Core i5-8200Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,245 points. Launch price was $291.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II X3 425e packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Core i5-8200Y offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X3 425e has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Athlon II X3 425e versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i5-8200Y — a 36.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-8200Y (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Athlon II X3 425e uses the Rana (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-8200Y uses Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X3 425e scores 2,239 against the Core i5-8200Y's 2,245 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-8200Y. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X3 425e vs 4 MB on the Core i5-8200Y.

Feature	Athlon II X3 425e	Core i5-8200Y
Cores / Threads	3 / 3+50%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	3.9 GHz+44%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+108%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB
Process	45 nm	14 nm-69%
Architecture	Rana (2009−2011)	Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021)
PassMark	2,239	2,245
Geekbench 6 Single	—	858

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X3 425e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-8200Y uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X3 425e versus LPDDR3-1866 on the Core i5-8200Y — the Core i5-8200Y supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X3 425e supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X3 425e) vs 10 (Core i5-8200Y) — the Core i5-8200Y offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM3 (Athlon II X3 425e) and Amber Lake-Y (Core i5-8200Y).

Feature	Athlon II X3 425e	Core i5-8200Y
Socket	AM3	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	LPDDR3-1866+40%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	10

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon II X3 425e) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-8200Y). The Core i5-8200Y includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 615), while the Athlon II X3 425e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-8200Y targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: Core i5-8200Y rivals Athlon 300U.