
Athlon II X3 445

Athlon II X4 600e
Athlon II X3 445 vs Athlon II X4 600e Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X3 445 vs Athlon II X4 600e FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Civilization VI
Athlon II X3 445 vs Athlon II X4 600e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X3 445
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $13 less on MSRP ($87 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.8 vs 17.9 PassMark/$ ($87 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X4 600e.
Athlon II X4 600e
2009Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Athlon II X3 445.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,795 vs 1,807).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.9 vs 20.8 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $87 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X3 445 better than Athlon II X4 600e?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X3 445 vs Athlon II X4 600e Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X3 445
The Athlon II X3 445 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,807 points. Launch price was $91.

Athlon II X4 600e
The Athlon II X4 600e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,795 points. Launch price was $130.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X3 445 packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Athlon II X4 600e offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 600e has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Athlon II X3 445 versus 2.2 GHz on the Athlon II X4 600e — a 34% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 445 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Athlon II X3 445 uses the Rana (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon II X4 600e uses Propus (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X3 445 scores 1,807 against the Athlon II X4 600e's 1,795 — a 0.7% lead for the Athlon II X3 445. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 445 | Athlon II X4 600e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 3 / 3 | 4 / 4+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz+41% | 2.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+41% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Rana (2009−2011) | Propus (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,807 | 1,795 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM3 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Athlon II X3 445 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X3 445) vs 16 (Athlon II X4 600e) — the Athlon II X4 600e offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM3 (Athlon II X3 445) and Socket AM3 (Athlon II X4 600e).
| Feature | Athlon II X3 445 | Athlon II X4 600e |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+100% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon II X3 445) / AMD-V (Athlon II X4 600e).
| Feature | Athlon II X3 445 | Athlon II X4 600e |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X3 445 was priced at $87, while the Athlon II X4 600e came in at $100. On launch pricing ($87 vs $100), Athlon II X3 445 was $13 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X3 445 delivers 20.8 pts/$ vs 17.9 pts/$ for the Athlon II X4 600e — making the Athlon II X3 445 the 14.6% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 445 | Athlon II X4 600e |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $87-13% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.8+16% | 17.9 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2009 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















