Athlon II X3 445 vs Core 2 Duo T7100
Athlon II X3 445
Core 2 Duo T7100
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X3 445 is positioned at rank 781 and the Core 2 Duo T7100 is on rank 24, so the Core 2 Duo T7100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X3 445
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7100
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon II X3 445 | Core 2 Duo T7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Rana (2009−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon II X3 445 | Core 2 Duo T7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X3 445 and Core 2 Duo T7100
Athlon II X3 445
The Athlon II X3 445 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,807 points. Launch price was $91.
Core 2 Duo T7100
The Core 2 Duo T7100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 May 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,817 points. Launch price was $197.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X3 445 packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T7100 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II X3 445 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Athlon II X3 445 versus 1.8 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7100 — a 53.1% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 445 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Athlon II X3 445 uses the Rana (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T7100 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X3 445 scores 1,807 against the Core 2 Duo T7100's 1,817 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7100. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 445 | Core 2 Duo T7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 3 / 3+50% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz+72% | 1.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+72% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB+300% |
| Process | 45 nm-31% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Rana (2009−2011) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,807 | 1,817 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X3 445 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T7100 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X3 445 versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7100 — the Athlon II X3 445 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM3 (Athlon II X3 445) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7100).
| Feature | Athlon II X3 445 | Core 2 Duo T7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333+50% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon II X3 445) / VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7100). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7100 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7100 rivals Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 445 | Core 2 Duo T7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Athlon II X3 445 launched at $87 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo T7100 debuted at $197. At current prices ($15 vs $15), the Core 2 Duo T7100 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X3 445 delivers 120.5 pts/$ vs 121.1 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo T7100 — making the Core 2 Duo T7100 the 0.6% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 445 | Core 2 Duo T7100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $87-56% | $197 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 120.5 | 121.1 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II X3 445 and Core 2 Duo T7100
