A6 Pro-7050B vs Athlon II X3 445

AMD

A6 Pro-7050B

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 3 GHz2014

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Athlon II X3 445

3 Cores3 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2010

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

A6 Pro-7050B

2014

Why buy it

  • +0.7% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 1W instead of 95W, a 94W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R4, while Athlon II X3 445 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.2 vs 20.8 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $87 MSRP).

Athlon II X3 445

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $13 less on MSRP ($87 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Delivers 14.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.8 vs 18.2 PassMark/$ ($87 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,807 vs 1,820).
  • 9400% higher power demand at 95W vs 1W.
  • No integrated graphics, while A6 Pro-7050B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6 Pro-7050B better than Athlon II X3 445?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Athlon II X3 445 is ahead with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A6 Pro-7050B pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6 Pro-7050B is the better fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
A6 Pro-7050B is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. A6 Pro-7050B is 14.9% more expensive on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $87 MSRP, and it gives you 0.7% better PassMark. Athlon II X3 445 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that is mostly used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 14.1% better value on paper (20.8 vs 18.2 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a very cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A6 Pro-7050B is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 3/3. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetA6 Pro-7050BAthlon II X3 445
1080p
low46 FPS45 FPS
medium46 FPS45 FPS
high46 FPS45 FPS
ultra46 FPS45 FPS
1440p
low46 FPS45 FPS
medium46 FPS45 FPS
high46 FPS45 FPS
ultra46 FPS45 FPS
4K
low46 FPS45 FPS
medium46 FPS45 FPS
high40 FPS41 FPS
ultra32 FPS32 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetA6 Pro-7050BAthlon II X3 445
1080p
low46 FPS45 FPS
medium46 FPS45 FPS
high46 FPS45 FPS
ultra46 FPS45 FPS
1440p
low46 FPS45 FPS
medium46 FPS45 FPS
high46 FPS45 FPS
ultra40 FPS45 FPS
4K
low43 FPS45 FPS
medium38 FPS45 FPS
high27 FPS45 FPS
ultra18 FPS30 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetA6 Pro-7050BAthlon II X3 445
1080p
low46 FPS45 FPS
medium46 FPS45 FPS
high46 FPS45 FPS
ultra46 FPS45 FPS
1440p
low46 FPS45 FPS
medium46 FPS45 FPS
high46 FPS45 FPS
ultra46 FPS45 FPS
4K
low46 FPS45 FPS
medium46 FPS45 FPS
high46 FPS45 FPS
ultra46 FPS45 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetA6 Pro-7050BAthlon II X3 445
1080p
low46 FPS45 FPS
medium46 FPS45 FPS
high46 FPS45 FPS
ultra46 FPS45 FPS
1440p
low46 FPS45 FPS
medium46 FPS45 FPS
high46 FPS45 FPS
ultra46 FPS45 FPS
4K
low46 FPS45 FPS
medium46 FPS45 FPS
high46 FPS45 FPS
ultra46 FPS45 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6 Pro-7050B and Athlon II X3 445

AMD

A6 Pro-7050B

The A6 Pro-7050B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,820 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Athlon II X3 445

The Athlon II X3 445 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,807 points. Launch price was $91.

Processing Power

The A6 Pro-7050B packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon II X3 445 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Athlon II X3 445 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A6 Pro-7050B versus 3.1 GHz on the Athlon II X3 445 — a 3.3% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 445 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The A6 Pro-7050B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon II X3 445 uses Rana (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6 Pro-7050B scores 1,820 against the Athlon II X3 445's 1,807 — a 0.7% lead for the A6 Pro-7050B.

FeatureA6 Pro-7050BAthlon II X3 445
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
3 / 3+50%
Boost Clock
3 GHz
3.1 GHz+3%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.1 GHz+41%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1024 kB+100%
512 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Kaveri (2014−2015)
Rana (2009−2011)
PassMark
1,820
1,807
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6 Pro-7050B uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X3 445 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Athlon II X3 445 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6 Pro-7050B) vs 0 (Athlon II X3 445) — the A6 Pro-7050B offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FP3 (A6 Pro-7050B) and AMD AM3 (Athlon II X3 445).

FeatureA6 Pro-7050BAthlon II X3 445
Socket
FP3
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

The A6 Pro-7050B includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R4), while the Athlon II X3 445 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureA6 Pro-7050BAthlon II X3 445
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon R4
💰

Value Analysis

The A6 Pro-7050B launched at $100 MSRP, while the Athlon II X3 445 debuted at $87. On MSRP ($100 vs $87), the Athlon II X3 445 is $13 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A6 Pro-7050B delivers 18.2 pts/$ vs 20.8 pts/$ for the Athlon II X3 445 — making the Athlon II X3 445 the 13.2% better value option.

FeatureA6 Pro-7050BAthlon II X3 445
MSRP
$100
$87-13%
Performance per Dollar
18.2
20.8+14%
Release Date
2014
2010