
A6 Pro-7050B
Popular choices:

Athlon II X3 445
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
A6 Pro-7050B
2014Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 95W, a 94W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R4, while Athlon II X3 445 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.2 vs 20.8 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $87 MSRP).
Athlon II X3 445
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $13 less on MSRP ($87 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 14.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.8 vs 18.2 PassMark/$ ($87 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,807 vs 1,820).
- ❌9400% higher power demand at 95W vs 1W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A6 Pro-7050B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
A6 Pro-7050B
2014Athlon II X3 445
2010Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 95W, a 94W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R4, while Athlon II X3 445 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $13 less on MSRP ($87 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 14.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.8 vs 18.2 PassMark/$ ($87 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.2 vs 20.8 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $87 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,807 vs 1,820).
- ❌9400% higher power demand at 95W vs 1W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A6 Pro-7050B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is A6 Pro-7050B better than Athlon II X3 445?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | A6 Pro-7050B | Athlon II X3 445 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | A6 Pro-7050B | Athlon II X3 445 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 30 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | A6 Pro-7050B | Athlon II X3 445 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | A6 Pro-7050B | Athlon II X3 445 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A6 Pro-7050B and Athlon II X3 445

A6 Pro-7050B
A6 Pro-7050B
The A6 Pro-7050B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,820 points. Launch price was $69.

Athlon II X3 445
Athlon II X3 445
The Athlon II X3 445 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,807 points. Launch price was $91.
Processing Power
The A6 Pro-7050B packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon II X3 445 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Athlon II X3 445 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A6 Pro-7050B versus 3.1 GHz on the Athlon II X3 445 — a 3.3% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 445 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The A6 Pro-7050B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon II X3 445 uses Rana (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6 Pro-7050B scores 1,820 against the Athlon II X3 445's 1,807 — a 0.7% lead for the A6 Pro-7050B.
| Feature | A6 Pro-7050B | Athlon II X3 445 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 3 / 3+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.1 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz+41% |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1024 kB+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Rana (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,820 | 1,807 |
Memory & Platform
The A6 Pro-7050B uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X3 445 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Athlon II X3 445 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6 Pro-7050B) vs 0 (Athlon II X3 445) — the A6 Pro-7050B offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FP3 (A6 Pro-7050B) and AMD AM3 (Athlon II X3 445).
| Feature | A6 Pro-7050B | Athlon II X3 445 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP3 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
The A6 Pro-7050B includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R4), while the Athlon II X3 445 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | A6 Pro-7050B | Athlon II X3 445 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon R4 | — |
Value Analysis
The A6 Pro-7050B launched at $100 MSRP, while the Athlon II X3 445 debuted at $87. On MSRP ($100 vs $87), the Athlon II X3 445 is $13 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A6 Pro-7050B delivers 18.2 pts/$ vs 20.8 pts/$ for the Athlon II X3 445 — making the Athlon II X3 445 the 13.2% better value option.
| Feature | A6 Pro-7050B | Athlon II X3 445 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $87-13% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.2 | 20.8+14% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













