A6 Pro-7050B vs Core i3-2330E

AMD

A6 Pro-7050B

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 3 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i3-2330E

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······

A6 Pro-7050B vs Core i3-2330E Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6 Pro-7050B vs Core i3-2330E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6 Pro-7050B vs Core i3-2330E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6 Pro-7050B

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $125 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
  • Delivers 124.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.2 vs 8.1 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
  • Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,820 vs 1,823).

Core i3-2330E

2011

Why buy it

  • +0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.1 vs 18.2 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is A6 Pro-7050B better than Core i3-2330E?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6 Pro-7050B is ahead with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2330E pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2330E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
A6 Pro-7050B is the better buy right now. A6 Pro-7050B comes in $125 cheaper on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $225 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i3-2330E is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 124.6% better value on MSRP (18.2 vs 8.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A6 Pro-7050B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6 Pro-7050B vs Core i3-2330E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

A6 Pro-7050B

The A6 Pro-7050B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,820 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i3-2330E

The Core i3-2330E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,823 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

The A6 Pro-7050B packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2330E's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A6 Pro-7050B versus 2.2 GHz on the Core i3-2330E — a 30.8% clock advantage for the A6 Pro-7050B (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The A6 Pro-7050B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-2330E uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6 Pro-7050B scores 1,820 against the Core i3-2330E's 1,823 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i3-2330E.

FeatureA6 Pro-7050BCore i3-2330E
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3 GHz+36%
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1024 kB+300%
256K (per core)
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Kaveri (2014−2015)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,820
1,823
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6 Pro-7050B uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-2330E uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A6 Pro-7050B versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2330E — the A6 Pro-7050B supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureA6 Pro-7050BCore i3-2330E
Socket
FP3
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600+20%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6 Pro-7050B) / VT-x (Core i3-2330E). Both include integrated graphics AMD Radeon R4 (A6 Pro-7050B) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2330E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-2330E targets Embedded.

FeatureA6 Pro-7050BCore i3-2330E
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon R4
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Embedded
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A6 Pro-7050B was priced at $100, while the Core i3-2330E came in at $225. On launch pricing ($100 vs $225), A6 Pro-7050B was $125 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A6 Pro-7050B delivers 18.2 pts/$ vs 8.1 pts/$ for the Core i3-2330E — making the A6 Pro-7050B the 76.8% better value option.

FeatureA6 Pro-7050BCore i3-2330E
MSRP
$100-56%
$225
Performance per Dollar
18.2+125%
8.1
Release Date
2014
2011

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.