A6 Pro-7050B vs Core i7-820QM

AMD

A6 Pro-7050B

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 3 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-820QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.06 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······

A6 Pro-7050B vs Core i7-820QM Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6 Pro-7050B vs Core i7-820QM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6 Pro-7050B vs Core i7-820QM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6 Pro-7050B

2014

Why buy it

  • +0.1% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $446 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $546 MSRP).
  • Delivers 446.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.2 vs 3.3 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $546 MSRP).
  • Draws 1W instead of 45W, a 44W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R4, while Core i7-820QM needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i7-820QM

2009

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (1,819 vs 1,820).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 18.2 PassMark/$ ($546 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
    • 4400% higher power demand at 45W vs 1W.
    • No integrated graphics, while A6 Pro-7050B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is A6 Pro-7050B better than Core i7-820QM?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-820QM is ahead with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A6 Pro-7050B pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6 Pro-7050B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    A6 Pro-7050B is the better buy right now. A6 Pro-7050B comes in $446 cheaper on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $546 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-820QM is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 446.3% better value on MSRP (18.2 vs 3.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    A6 Pro-7050B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    A6 Pro-7050B vs Core i7-820QM Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    A6 Pro-7050B

    The A6 Pro-7050B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,820 points. Launch price was $69.

    Intel

    Core i7-820QM

    The Core i7-820QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.73 GHz, with boost up to 3.06 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,819 points. Launch price was $546.

    Processing Power

    The A6 Pro-7050B packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i7-820QM offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-820QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A6 Pro-7050B versus 3.06 GHz on the Core i7-820QM — a 2% clock advantage for the Core i7-820QM (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.73 GHz). The A6 Pro-7050B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-820QM uses Clarksfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6 Pro-7050B scores 1,820 against the Core i7-820QM's 1,819 — a 0.1% lead for the A6 Pro-7050B.

    FeatureA6 Pro-7050BCore i7-820QM
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    4 / 8+100%
    Boost Clock
    3 GHz
    3.06 GHz+2%
    Base Clock
    2.2 GHz+27%
    1.73 GHz
    L3 Cache
    8 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    1024 kB+300%
    256 kB (per core)
    Process
    28 nm-38%
    45 nm
    Architecture
    Kaveri (2014−2015)
    Clarksfield (2009−2010)
    PassMark
    1,820
    1,819
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The A6 Pro-7050B uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-820QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A6 Pro-7050B versus 1333 on the Core i7-820QM — the A6 Pro-7050B supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6 Pro-7050B supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD FP3 (A6 Pro-7050B) and PM55,HM55,QM57 (Core i7-820QM).

    FeatureA6 Pro-7050BCore i7-820QM
    Socket
    FP3
    PGA988
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0+50%
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1600+20%
    1333
    Max RAM Capacity
    16 GB+100%
    8 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    16
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: not specified (A6 Pro-7050B) / true (Core i7-820QM). The A6 Pro-7050B includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R4), while the Core i7-820QM requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-820QM rivals Core 2 Quad Q9000.

    FeatureA6 Pro-7050BCore i7-820QM
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    No
    IGPU Model
    AMD Radeon R4
    None
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    true
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the A6 Pro-7050B was priced at $100, while the Core i7-820QM came in at $546. On launch pricing ($100 vs $546), A6 Pro-7050B was $446 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A6 Pro-7050B delivers 18.2 pts/$ vs 3.3 pts/$ for the Core i7-820QM — making the A6 Pro-7050B the 138.1% better value option.

    FeatureA6 Pro-7050BCore i7-820QM
    MSRP
    $100-82%
    $546
    Performance per Dollar
    18.2+452%
    3.3
    Release Date
    2014
    2009

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.