A6 Pro-7050B vs Atom C3508

A6 Pro-7050B vs Atom C3508 Performance Spectrum

A6 Pro-7050B

2 / 2

1,820

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom C3508

4 / 4

1,831

+0.6%

Atom x5-Z8330

Core i3-3217U

Core 2 Duo T5270

Celeron Dual-Core T1500

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6 Pro-7050B vs Atom C3508 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6 Pro-7050B vs Atom C3508: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6 Pro-7050B

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 11W, a 10W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R4, while Atom C3508 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,820 vs 1,831).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Atom C3508 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Atom C3508

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌1025% higher power demand at 11.25W vs 1W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6 Pro-7050B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6 Pro-7050B better than Atom C3508?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6 Pro-7050B is ahead with a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom C3508 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom C3508 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6 Pro-7050B is the better buy right now. A6 Pro-7050B comes in at an unclear MSRP at $100 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Atom C3508 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (18.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom C3508 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6 Pro-7050B vs Atom C3508 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6 Pro-7050B

The A6 Pro-7050B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,820 points. Launch price was $69.

Atom C3508

The Atom C3508 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,831 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6 Pro-7050B packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Atom C3508 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3508 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A6 Pro-7050B versus 1.6 GHz on the Atom C3508 — a 60.9% clock advantage for the A6 Pro-7050B (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The A6 Pro-7050B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Atom C3508 uses Goldmont (2016−2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A6 Pro-7050B scores 1,820 against the Atom C3508's 1,831 — a 0.6% lead for the Atom C3508.

Feature	A6 Pro-7050B	Atom C3508
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3 GHz+87%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+38%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	—	8 MB
L2 Cache	1024 kB	8 MB+700%
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Goldmont (2016−2017)
PassMark	1,820	1,831

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6 Pro-7050B uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom C3508 uses FCBGA1310 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A6 Pro-7050B versus DDR4-1866 on the Atom C3508 — the Atom C3508 supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3508 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6 Pro-7050B) vs 12 (Atom C3508) — the A6 Pro-7050B offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FP3 (A6 Pro-7050B) and Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3508).

Feature	A6 Pro-7050B	Atom C3508
Socket	FP3	FCBGA1310
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR4-1866+17%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	256 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12