A6 Pro-7050B vs Core i3-2365M

A6 Pro-7050B vs Core i3-2365M Performance Spectrum

A6 Pro-7050B

2 / 2

1,820

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-2365M

2 / 4

1,826

+0.3%

Pentium B950

Core i3-2310M

Pentium J3710

Celeron Dual-Core T1500

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6 Pro-7050B vs Core i3-2365M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6 Pro-7050B vs Core i3-2365M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6 Pro-7050B

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,820 vs 1,826).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Core i3-2365M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i3-2365M

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is A6 Pro-7050B better than Core i3-2365M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6 Pro-7050B is ahead with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2365M pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2365M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6 Pro-7050B is the better buy right now. A6 Pro-7050B comes in at an unclear MSRP at $100 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i3-2365M is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (18.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6 Pro-7050B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6 Pro-7050B vs Core i3-2365M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6 Pro-7050B

The A6 Pro-7050B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,820 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-2365M

The Core i3-2365M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,826 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6 Pro-7050B packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2365M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A6 Pro-7050B versus 1.4 GHz on the Core i3-2365M — a 72.7% clock advantage for the A6 Pro-7050B (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The A6 Pro-7050B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-2365M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6 Pro-7050B scores 1,820 against the Core i3-2365M's 1,826 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-2365M.

Feature	A6 Pro-7050B	Core i3-2365M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3 GHz+114%	1.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+57%	1.4 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB
L2 Cache	1024 kB+100%	512 kB
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,820	1,826
Geekbench 6 Single	—	235

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6 Pro-7050B uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-2365M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A6 Pro-7050B versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2365M — the A6 Pro-7050B supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD FP3 (A6 Pro-7050B) and HM65,HM67,QM67,HM75,HM76,HM77 (Core i3-2365M).

Feature	A6 Pro-7050B	Core i3-2365M
Socket	FP3	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6 Pro-7050B) / VT-x, EPT (Core i3-2365M). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon R4 (A6 Pro-7050B) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2365M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-2365M targets Thin & Light Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-2365M rivals Pentium 987.