A6 Pro-7050B vs Atom N2800

A6 Pro-7050B vs Atom N2800 Performance Spectrum

A6 Pro-7050B

2 / 2

1,820

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom N2800

2 / 4

1,829

+0.5%

Pentium B950

Celeron G470

Pentium J3710

Celeron Dual-Core T1500

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6 Pro-7050B vs Atom N2800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6 Pro-7050B vs Atom N2800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6 Pro-7050B

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 7W, a 6W reduction.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,820 vs 1,829).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.2 vs 38.9 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $47 MSRP).

Atom N2800

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $53 less on MSRP ($47 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 113.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.9 vs 18.2 PassMark/$ ($47 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌600% higher power demand at 7W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is A6 Pro-7050B better than Atom N2800?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6 Pro-7050B is ahead with a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom N2800 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom N2800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6 Pro-7050B is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. A6 Pro-7050B comes in 112.8% more expensive on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $47 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Atom N2800 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 0.7% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6 Pro-7050B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6 Pro-7050B vs Atom N2800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6 Pro-7050B

The A6 Pro-7050B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,820 points. Launch price was $69.

Atom N2800

The Atom N2800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview-M (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,829 points. Launch price was $47.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6 Pro-7050B packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Atom N2800's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A6 Pro-7050B versus 1.87 GHz on the Atom N2800 — a 46.4% clock advantage for the A6 Pro-7050B (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The A6 Pro-7050B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Atom N2800 uses Cedarview-M (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6 Pro-7050B scores 1,820 against the Atom N2800's 1,829 — a 0.5% lead for the Atom N2800.

Feature	A6 Pro-7050B	Atom N2800
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3 GHz+60%	1.87 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+18%	1.86 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1024 kB+100%	512K (per core)
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Cedarview-M (2011−2012)
PassMark	1,820	1,829

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6 Pro-7050B uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom N2800 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A6 Pro-7050B versus DDR3-1066 on the Atom N2800 — the A6 Pro-7050B supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6 Pro-7050B supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (A6 Pro-7050B) vs 1 (Atom N2800). PCIe lanes: 16 (A6 Pro-7050B) vs 4 (Atom N2800) — the A6 Pro-7050B offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FP3 (A6 Pro-7050B) and Intel NM10 (Atom N2800).

Feature	A6 Pro-7050B	Atom N2800
Socket	FP3	FCBGA559
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+50%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+300%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon R4 (A6 Pro-7050B) and Intel GMA 3650 (Atom N2800) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.

Feature	A6 Pro-7050B	Atom N2800
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon R4	Intel GMA 3650

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A6 Pro-7050B was priced at $100, while the Atom N2800 came in at $47. On launch pricing ($100 vs $47), Atom N2800 was $53 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A6 Pro-7050B delivers 18.2 pts/$ vs 38.9 pts/$ for the Atom N2800 — making the Atom N2800 the 72.5% better value option.

Feature	A6 Pro-7050B	Atom N2800
MSRP	$100	$47-53%
Performance per Dollar	18.2	38.9+114%
Release Date	2014	2011

Search A6 Pro-7050B on Amazon

Search Atom N2800 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.