A6 Pro-7050B vs Atom N2800
A6 Pro-7050B
Atom N2800
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6 Pro-7050B is positioned at rank 921 and the Atom N2800 is on rank 147, so the Atom N2800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A6 Pro-7050B
Performance Per Dollar Atom N2800
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A6 Pro-7050B | Atom N2800 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($3) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Cedarview-M (2011−2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A6 Pro-7050B | Atom N2800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+402%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($3) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A6 Pro-7050B and Atom N2800
A6 Pro-7050B
The A6 Pro-7050B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,820 points. Launch price was $69.
Atom N2800
The Atom N2800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview-M (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,829 points. Launch price was $47.
Processing Power
The A6 Pro-7050B packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Atom N2800's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A6 Pro-7050B versus 1.87 GHz on the Atom N2800 — a 46.4% clock advantage for the A6 Pro-7050B (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The A6 Pro-7050B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Atom N2800 uses Cedarview-M (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6 Pro-7050B scores 1,820 against the Atom N2800's 1,829 — a 0.5% lead for the Atom N2800.
| Feature | A6 Pro-7050B | Atom N2800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz+60% | 1.87 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+18% | 1.86 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1024 kB+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm-13% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 1,820 | 1,829 |
Memory & Platform
The A6 Pro-7050B uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom N2800 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The A6 Pro-7050B supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (A6 Pro-7050B) vs 1 (Atom N2800). PCIe lanes: 16 (A6 Pro-7050B) vs 4 (Atom N2800) — the A6 Pro-7050B offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FP3 (A6 Pro-7050B) and Intel NM10 (Atom N2800).
| Feature | A6 Pro-7050B | Atom N2800 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP3 | FCBGA559 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+300% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+300% | 4 |
Advanced Features
Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon R4 (A6 Pro-7050B) and Intel GMA 3650 (Atom N2800) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | A6 Pro-7050B | Atom N2800 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon R4 | Intel GMA 3650 |
Value Analysis
The A6 Pro-7050B launched at $100 MSRP, while the Atom N2800 debuted at $47. At current prices ($15 vs $3), the Atom N2800 is $12 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A6 Pro-7050B delivers 121.3 pts/$ vs 609.7 pts/$ for the Atom N2800 — making the Atom N2800 the 133.6% better value option.
| Feature | A6 Pro-7050B | Atom N2800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $47-53% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $3-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 121.3 | 609.7+403% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A6 Pro-7050B and Atom N2800
