A6 Pro-7050B
VS
Athlon 64 X2 6000+

A6 Pro-7050B vs Athlon 64 X2 6000+

AMD

A6 Pro-7050B

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 3 GHz2014
VS
AMD

Athlon 64 X2 6000+

2 Cores2 Thrd125 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6 Pro-7050B is positioned at rank 921 and the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is on rank 1077, so the A6 Pro-7050B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6 Pro-7050B

#909
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1612%
#910
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1588%
#911
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1458%
#912
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1452%
#913
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1438%
#915
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1389%
#916
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1332%
#917
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1330%
#918
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1294%
#921
A6 Pro-7050B
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
100%
#923
Athlon II N370
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#928
A8-6410
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
97%
#933
Athlon X2 L310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 6000+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
76777%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
72547%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
52675%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
15869%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
12570%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
10996%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
6298%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
6216%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
5660%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
5659%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
5596%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
5445%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
5369%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
5347%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
5299%
#1077
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
MSRP: $450|Avg: $20
100%
#1078
Athlon 64 3600+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $15
98%
#1079
Core 2 Quad Q6700
MSRP: $530|Avg: $50
97%
#1080
Athlon 64 2600+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
97%
#1081
Celeron 2.20
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
95%
#1082
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $15
88%
#1083
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
MSRP: $328|Avg: $10
88%
#1084
Core i7-975
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
87%
#1085
Athlon XP 2600+
MSRP: $98|Avg: $10
85%
#1086
Core i7-965
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $40
84%
#1087
Athlon 64 FX-74
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
82%
#1088
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
81%
#1089
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
81%
#1090
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
MSRP: $505|Avg: $15
81%
#1091
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
MSRP: $485|Avg: $78
81%
#1092
Celeron 2.30
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A6 Pro-7050B (2014) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3-1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA6 Pro-7050BAthlon 64 X2 6000+
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (2007) relies on 90 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA6 Pro-7050BAthlon 64 X2 6000+
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+33%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6 Pro-7050B and Athlon 64 X2 6000+

AMD

A6 Pro-7050B

The A6 Pro-7050B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,820 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Athlon 64 X2 6000+

The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,825 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the A6 Pro-7050B and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A6 Pro-7050B versus 3.1 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ — a 3.3% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 6000+. The A6 Pro-7050B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ uses Windsor (2006−2007) (90 nm). In PassMark, the A6 Pro-7050B scores 1,820 against the Athlon 64 X2 6000+'s 1,825 — a 0.3% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 6000+.

FeatureA6 Pro-7050BAthlon 64 X2 6000+
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3 GHz
3.1 GHz+3%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1024 kB+100%
512K
Process
28 nm-69%
90 nm
Architecture
Kaveri (2014−2015)
Windsor (2006−2007)
PassMark
1,820
1,825
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6 Pro-7050B uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ uses AM2 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A6 Pro-7050B versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ — the A6 Pro-7050B supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6 Pro-7050B) vs 0 (Athlon 64 X2 6000+) — the A6 Pro-7050B offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FP3 (A6 Pro-7050B) and AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 6000+).

FeatureA6 Pro-7050BAthlon 64 X2 6000+
Socket
FP3
AM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600+50%
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

The A6 Pro-7050B includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R4), while the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureA6 Pro-7050BAthlon 64 X2 6000+
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon R4
💰

Value Analysis

The A6 Pro-7050B launched at $100 MSRP, while the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ debuted at $450. At current prices ($15 vs $20), the A6 Pro-7050B is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A6 Pro-7050B delivers 121.3 pts/$ vs 91.3 pts/$ for the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ — making the A6 Pro-7050B the 28.3% better value option.

FeatureA6 Pro-7050BAthlon 64 X2 6000+
MSRP
$100-78%
$450
Avg Price (30d)
$15-25%
$20
Performance per Dollar
121.3+33%
91.3
Release Date
2014
2007