A6 Pro-7050B vs Atom x5-E3940

A6 Pro-7050B vs Atom x5-E3940 Performance Spectrum

A6 Pro-7050B

2 / 2

1,820

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom x5-E3940

4 / 4

1,816

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6 Pro-7050B vs Atom x5-E3940 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6 Pro-7050B vs Atom x5-E3940: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6 Pro-7050B

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 10W, a 9W reduction.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Atom x5-E3940 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Atom x5-E3940

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,816 vs 1,820).
❌900% higher power demand at 10W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is A6 Pro-7050B better than Atom x5-E3940?

Yes. A6 Pro-7050B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6 Pro-7050B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6 Pro-7050B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6 Pro-7050B is the better buy right now. A6 Pro-7050B comes in at an unclear MSRP at $100 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (18.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x5-E3940 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

A6 Pro-7050B vs Atom x5-E3940 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6 Pro-7050B

The A6 Pro-7050B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,820 points. Launch price was $69.

Atom x5-E3940

The Atom x5-E3940 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,816 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6 Pro-7050B packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Atom x5-E3940 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom x5-E3940 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A6 Pro-7050B versus 1.8 GHz on the Atom x5-E3940 — a 50% clock advantage for the A6 Pro-7050B (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The A6 Pro-7050B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Atom x5-E3940 uses Apollo Lake (2014−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A6 Pro-7050B scores 1,820 against the Atom x5-E3940's 1,816 — a 0.2% lead for the A6 Pro-7050B.

Feature	A6 Pro-7050B	Atom x5-E3940
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3 GHz+67%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+38%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1024 kB	2 MB (total)+100%
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
PassMark	1,820	1,816

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6 Pro-7050B uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom x5-E3940 uses FCBGA1296 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A6 Pro-7050B versus DDR3L-1866 on the Atom x5-E3940 — the Atom x5-E3940 supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6 Pro-7050B supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6 Pro-7050B) vs 6 (Atom x5-E3940) — the A6 Pro-7050B offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FP3 (A6 Pro-7050B) and Intel FCBGA1296 (Atom x5-E3940).

Feature	A6 Pro-7050B	Atom x5-E3940
Socket	FP3	FCBGA1296
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR3L-1866+17%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16+167%	6

🔧

Advanced Features

Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon R4 (A6 Pro-7050B) and Intel HD Graphics 500 (Atom x5-E3940) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.