
Athlon II X3 455
Popular choices:

Core 2 Quad Q8300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Athlon II X3 455
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $91 less on MSRP ($88 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 105.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.0 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($88 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core 2 Quad Q8300
2008Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,917 vs 1,938).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 22.0 PassMark/$ ($179 MSRP vs $88 MSRP).
Athlon II X3 455
2010Core 2 Quad Q8300
2008Why buy it
- ✅Costs $91 less on MSRP ($88 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 105.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.0 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($88 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,917 vs 1,938).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 22.0 PassMark/$ ($179 MSRP vs $88 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X3 455 better than Core 2 Quad Q8300?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Athlon II X3 455 | Core 2 Quad Q8300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Athlon II X3 455 | Core 2 Quad Q8300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 48 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Athlon II X3 455 | Core 2 Quad Q8300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Athlon II X3 455 | Core 2 Quad Q8300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X3 455 and Core 2 Quad Q8300

Athlon II X3 455
Athlon II X3 455
The Athlon II X3 455 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 December 2010 (14 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,938 points. Launch price was $88.

Core 2 Quad Q8300
Core 2 Quad Q8300
The Core 2 Quad Q8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,917 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X3 455 packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q8300 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Athlon II X3 455 versus 2.5 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q8300 — a 27.6% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 455 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Athlon II X3 455 uses the Rana (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 uses Yorkfield (2007−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X3 455 scores 1,938 against the Core 2 Quad Q8300's 1,917 — a 1.1% lead for the Athlon II X3 455. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 455 | Core 2 Quad Q8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 3 / 3 | 4 / 4+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz+32% | 2.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+32% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 4 MB (total)+700% |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Rana (2009−2011) | Yorkfield (2007−2009) |
| PassMark | 1,938+1% | 1,917 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X3 455 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 455 | Core 2 Quad Q8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Value Analysis
The Athlon II X3 455 launched at $88 MSRP, while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 debuted at $179. On MSRP ($88 vs $179), the Athlon II X3 455 is $91 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X3 455 delivers 22.0 pts/$ vs 10.7 pts/$ for the Core 2 Quad Q8300 — making the Athlon II X3 455 the 69.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 455 | Core 2 Quad Q8300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $88-51% | $179 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.0+106% | 10.7 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













