
Athlon II X3 455

Xeon E5603
Athlon II X3 455 vs Xeon E5603 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X3 455 vs Xeon E5603 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X3 455 vs Xeon E5603: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X3 455
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($88 MSRP vs $188 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 114.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.0 vs 10.3 PassMark/$ ($88 MSRP vs $188 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5603, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
- ❌18.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 80W.
Xeon E5603
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 95W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon II X3 455 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,935 vs 1,938).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.3 vs 22.0 PassMark/$ ($188 MSRP vs $88 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X3 455 better than Xeon E5603?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X3 455 vs Xeon E5603 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X3 455
The Athlon II X3 455 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 December 2010 (14 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,938 points. Launch price was $88.

Xeon E5603
The Xeon E5603 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,935 points. Launch price was $286.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X3 455 packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Xeon E5603 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5603 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Athlon II X3 455 versus 1.6 GHz on the Xeon E5603 — a 69.4% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 455 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Athlon II X3 455 uses the Rana (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon E5603 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X3 455 scores 1,938 against the Xeon E5603's 1,935 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon II X3 455. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X3 455 vs 4 MB (total) on the Xeon E5603.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 455 | Xeon E5603 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 3 / 3 | 4 / 4+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz+106% | 1.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+106% | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Rana (2009−2011) | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,938 | 1,935 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X3 455 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5603 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X3 455 versus DDR3-1066 on the Xeon E5603 — the Athlon II X3 455 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5603 supports up to 288 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 800% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon II X3 455) vs 3 (Xeon E5603). PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X3 455) vs 32 (Xeon E5603) — the Xeon E5603 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 455 | Xeon E5603 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333+25% | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 288 GB+800% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 3+50% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 32 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon II X3 455) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5603). Primary use case: Xeon E5603 targets Server.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 455 | Xeon E5603 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X3 455 was priced at $88, while the Xeon E5603 came in at $188. On launch pricing ($88 vs $188), Athlon II X3 455 was $100 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X3 455 delivers 22.0 pts/$ vs 10.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5603 — making the Athlon II X3 455 the 72.6% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 455 | Xeon E5603 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $88-53% | $188 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.0+114% | 10.3 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















